rajanchandi

We’ve built an embeddable Q&A widget (Ask/Help widget) to boost in-site user engagement, help build a knowledge base and auto-answer repeat customer queries via smart auto-complete.

We measure the frequency of the questions asked on the widget and auto rank them for you. so, you can spend time answering only the most frequent ones.

Our landing page features 3-min demo video and it takes only a minute to try us.

https://www.respond101.com

We're looking for Beta testers.

(Superscript vs Chatterbot vs IBM Watson Dialog vs Chatscript vs X?)

I like the idea of WikiTribune but involving real journalists in an organization can be very slow and could cover only a small amount of news. It'd be a better idea to rank existing news articles on the basis of their truthfulness by allowing community members to point out fake/biased parts of it or good/objective parts of an article. It'd be a little slower for the reader to consume the news but the quality and truthfulness of the news can be preserved.

Let's assume that we built a website and a chrome plugin combo. The plugin will allow anyone to flag the fake/biased parts of a news article and the website will show the articles ranked on the action by community members (and geographic location, maybe).

Will this be sustainable as a startup/organization i.e. paying bills for a small team which builds and maintains the software? Will you/people pay a subscription to such an aggregator site which attempts to list the news links based on the truthfulness of the content? I'd love to know your perspective.

They're open source and seems like a serious alternative to Firebase/Parse. Also, they full support NPM unlike Meteor. Can they be considered as primary interface for backend and for the APIs?