justo-rivera

Its the best editor out there - simple and powerful. This is what MS Paint was in the 00s

Great video edition, in your windows machine.

So, here is why i rant:

It's a 3,56GB app in a clean windows installation (11). It stopped working, so i uninstalled it.

Immediatly, i google'd "Climpchamp download".

TURNS OUT IT'S A JAVASCRIPT APP

And you can (should) use it at app.clipchamp.com

(Microsoft-owned)

So why the hell do i need to install an exe to run an application that is a browser that actually runs perfectly in my browser?

BECAUSE YOU WANTED TO LIVE IN SILICON VALLEY

Any free alternative to upwork?

I am in the street and working freelance gigs would help me, but this concept seems pervasive of charging a quote to be able to earn

Thanks!!

We all act like writing www. is lame and for dads/grandparents, but the truth is:

1. you never know when you need to write https://

2. it looks a lot uglier

3. literally means "hypertext transfer protocol (secure)" (I had to look it up, and i am a hacker news user.)

4. just happened to me: in a youtube description you cant just put ycombinator.com, you have to write https://ycombinator.com. This is not a problem if We Write World Wide Web When We Want to link to a Website

Ugh, seriously, deprecating the <marquee> element is just another example of overzealous standardization gone wrong! Why do they have to strip away the charm of the early internet? It's like they want to erase the playful and creative side of web design.

I mean, come on! My child used to have a blast customizing their Myspace page with those scrolling marquee texts and funky animations. It was a form of expression! Now, they're taking it away just because of some accessibility concerns and responsive design mumbo jumbo.

And what's the deal with trashing <blink> too? Okay, maybe it was a bit annoying, but if people don't like it, they won't use it. Why do we have to conform to this sterile, one-size-fits-all approach? Let the internet be a playground for creativity, not a cookie-cutter, sanitized environment.

Sure, there might be security concerns, but seriously, it's not like the whole internet is going to collapse because of a few blinking texts. Sometimes, it feels like they're just sucking the fun out of web development, forcing everyone to adhere to their rigid standards.

I miss the days when you could inject a bit of personality into your online presence without being judged for it. Bring back the marquee! Let people decide for themselves if they want to embrace the nostalgic quirks of the early web.

I want to paint parts of my code a different color to identify functions and parts visually.

For example on a JSON im editing i would like to select an object and right-click to change the color - making the linter theme for example more red or making the background red.

I'm interested in how to do this on vscode but also on opinions on the utility of this type of thing. I come from music producing and there its very important to color each part to conceptually draw a picture, but seems like in the programming world we just want to do it automatically / based on rules

If film grains are randomly or chaotically distributed, and fractal over enough orders of magnitude, grain might not be error but a medium which interprets and conveys information differently, with unique advantages. But now I'm afraid I sound like an audiophile who buys wooden amp knobs for performance.

TeMPOraL on Nov 14, 2022 [–]

You've stumbled on an actual, practical use case: encoding watermarks in the grain. I can imagine a watermark hidden in the grain, spread over long enough time (say couple seconds to a minute), so it can survive reencoding with heavy compression and containing enough bits to identify the source of the video on a per-copy/per-user basis.