here are some requirements that i can think of:
- not huge. small enough to use with 1 hand
- able to root and install custom OS without too much difficulty/annoyance (the manufacturer doesn't actively try to stop you from modifying your own device)
- able to use mint mobile
- has a trackball (like the htc hero, that thing was fuckin awesome)
- possibly some hardware buttonsWhat repos would you like to mirrored?
And do you know of any existing good mirrors out there that host good repos?
i try to see beyond any initial repulsion to weird looking code because i know that it may be super functional. but it got me thinking: what makes code beautiful? what makes code "high quality"? (other than that it results in a working, performant, and robust software program obviously).
so i'm curious -- can you show me the best code you've encountered? it can be a small snippet or it can be a "slice of a library" or an architecture etc. have you written anything yourself that you are super proud of?
Here's Mine: - text editor: geany and vim/neovim - IDE: vim/neovim, vscode - web browser: firefox - window manager: openbox - taskbar: tint2 - GUI filemanager: thunar - terminal multiplexer: tmux - media player: vlc
[0]: https://igwiki.lyci.de/wiki/List_of_recommended_GNU/Linux_software
Can you give a rundown on how those rules came about? What do the other developers think about the rules and the future of android?
Also, why did you switch away from the alphabetical naming conventions for the android versions?
I'm posting this because I haven't heard anything about this from anyone who actually works on android. Figure this would be a good place to post.
We all see that it seems pretty much everyone has gone insane, or at least that's what the narrative portrays. Why are companies, governments, and other organizations doing such stupid things?
So we've made machines that can appear to "think", by articulating linguistic constructs that make sense. In fact, there appears to be actual semantic and logical structure embedded within the neural networks of LLMs. Ok, let's keep our heads on straight, keep in mind the mathematics involved, chill out, and just think about what it is that we actually want (and what "we" are, for that matter). Are we going to someday transcend language? I'm aware that I'm typing this message out to you, using language, with hopes that this form of communication will become obsolete. But what will that look like? I know that human language in it's current form is severely limited.
If we're to design some future communication protocol and methodology, let's contemplate what types of things even need to be communicated? For example, what is "the news" nowadays? Could it be simply a video stream of the sunrise? Well it would take a long time to get there. In the meantime, it should probably be something like "yeah, it's another day, and humans are doing the work necessary to put order to chaos and make things better for everyone".
From a more concrete perspective, I'd say that we've reached the point when we can transcend the idea of what "work" is currently. We can see beyond the limited view of doing things for monetary profit, and see that certain systems could be implemented much better if there were certain forms of entity-organization and resource-allocation at play. What is a company if it's ran by a computer? What does it serve? I mean, it sounds silly to suggest some big companies with overlapping domains of operation should consolidate their operations, but we all know that that's where things should be headed in many cases.
So yeah, what's your vision for the future?