SherlockeHolmes

Yello! I am trying to build a data-visual interactive site. Here is what I got so far out of my research. I have included my idea of what the stack will look like. I am hoping for feedback that fills in gaps in understanding, shows alternatives/better options, and more! Forgive any egregious oversights.

--- databases (tech not yet researched) --- core logic (tech: sbcl) --- server compute & memory (aws?) --- routers/switches/network devices (tech: invented already at DARPA) --- client OS through access points on device (tech: variable) --- Client browsers (tech: engines and parsers for html, js, css) --- DOM (tech: put together by choices of models, views, and controllers using html, css, angular) --- User interface (tech: human)

Claim is that Clause VI is not clear enough on the succession of Presidency in cases of injury, resignation, or other forms of incapacitation of a sitting President - when in reality Clause VI instructs on the subject and is specific enough to differentiate among these cases.

Clause VI is clear in mentioning that in all of these cases, the incapacitation/suspension/resignation of the President's Office also devolves to Office of the Vice President, thus rendering currently adopted amendment unconstitutional.

It also prudently allows the Congress to make the selection of an "acting" President from a pool of people loosely referred to as "Officer", until return of sitting President to health or an election.

This is a hypothesis. I may fledge it out later. Share any relevant literature. Discuss and treat it as your own.

There are examples of polygamy, polyandry, and group marriages throughout recorded history. It can be argued that these often served the purpose of allowing dominant male or female to create many offsprings with maximum genetic diversity.

Now in a more codified and urbanized society - a man or a woman who sees it fit to share her or his sperms or egg can do so through the medical system without requiring multiple marriages.

Dear HN,

Is it possible for us to have a live chat-box that users can use to give answers to each other in real-time?

I believe this can be functional without being burdensome and intrusive. Hopefully one of us can write an intelligent bot that will filter useless spam and only allow valid stack-exchange like questions. The bot - as far as I know - won't be able to do a perfect job, but we can also have volunteer moderators to take care of spams that filter through.

The purpose of this chat-box would be to allow for the answering of a quick question that can be answered within 2-3 sentences.

tl;dr - think of upvotes as "watch later" button (YouTube), or "add to reading list" checkbox (Quora). do not use it as a "like/react" button (Facebook), or "Upvote" (Quora).

The way I use HN is this - I browse the Front Page and the "new" section as often as I can. I go through a couple of pages (as permitted by time) for both sections and upvote those that are relevant to whatever I may be learning at the time. Anything I upvote (threads and comments) are saved, providing me with easy access to all of the information within vicinity.

This is the most useful thing about HN, this ability to collect knowledge in an organized manner with possibly most minimal effort. And I am afraid that most of us do not realize this.

If it was so (that we use upvotes similar to how we use bookmarks) - then I personally would expect to see a broader distribution of votes among topics that would parallel the necessarily broader range of interests in any large collection of human beings.

Instead, we observe a centralized tendency where predictable topics garner hundreds of votes, while most languish with 1 or 2. This is a result of muscle memory from using Facebook's like button.

I'll try to make time and add some visual evidence of this in a few months using HN's API.

In relevance to latest news of Uber's launching a Yacht service. source: http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/28/sport/uber-yacht-launches-dubai/index.html

I've been watching this for a while (but as a passive bystander, not as an active analyzer. however I trust my judgment enough to still make conclusions).

Firstly, I am a believer and a proponent of share economy. It is here to stay, and it is the future. Lots to say here, but let them be told in silence.

The early companies working in the sharing economy space (Uber, Lyft, TaskRabbit, Fiverr, Skillshare, Tradesy, JustPark, Bla Bla Car, Leftover Swap, Streetbank, Feastly, RelayRides, Cookening, Peers, Collaborative Consumption, Yerdle, Postdates, Favor, Instacart - please ignore inappropriate exclusion/inclusion) have shown a susceptibility to the enormous profit-making opportunity in this space (as expected any time a new technology opens up a new industry) and have been making terrible business decisions.

This is one of them. Discuss!!

post script: my on topic reasoning - very early attempted horizontal integration within transportation space.

Please excuse the horrendous(if it is so) structure of my post. :D

edit: substitute "poorly conducted" with "very early"

two things noticed (with a third footnote that is not a footnote in significance, and significance having decided no ordering at any level) -

1. Nation's first LGBT magazine editor and US embassy worker in Bangladesh hacked down along with companion. I think the Bangladeshi state has become a big concern for the following reason - it is a highly populous country with a rising literacy rate (at least in terms of primary education). such a dense populace with literacy without proper higher education armed with the power of the internet is extremely sensitive to propaganda. i have a sick feeling that one of the alternate realities possible has Bangladesh serving as a powder keg that served a source of Jihadists in a WWIII.

2) Tom Brady's suspension to be or not to be reinstated. Beautiful (but ineffective, to the yet to be learned dismay of the provocateurs) distraction during a vital time on Earth.

footnote: According to PressTV News Videos on YouTube (afaik a channel from Iran) says that all warring sides on Yemen agree on calling a truce except the government loyalists and Saudi Arabia.

edit: removed "state run" - I assumed that.