The first $100,000 of income can be excluded. On income above that, the US demands the difference if the taxes in the foreign country are less than US taxes. I think you acknowledge all this quite well when you call it inconvenient, but I think people don't need to be horribly outraged about it (I think the policy likely does close a path of tax avoidance that would be well used, but I'm pretty ambivalent about whether it is reasonable).
BTW for non uk people Boris is going to be the next Leader of the Tory's and possibly PM within 5 years
I don't think you even need a passport, just a proof of nationality (e.g. a national ID card from your country of origin, that's usually free or much cheaper than a passport)
Soooo if your US passport expires you no longer have this tax?
I would have thought it was based on US citizenship not travelling on a US passport.
For example, if you have a US or Signapore passport, you might be able to enter a lot of countries without a visa, but Brazil is not one of them. Brazil is obviously a hugely important country, so that seems like a notable disadvantage. EU citizens can enter Brazil without a visa.
Additionally, there are several countries that have special (higher) visa fees for processing US passports.
Having a Schengen passport is also pretty sweet if you want to move to a different Schengen country.
Finally, if you get kidnapped for a random, you don't want to have to rely on a US passport! (Then again, if you get kidnapped by North Korea, Bill Clinton might personally fly over to negotiate your release.)
As an aside you're misinformed about what Schengen is. Having a passport from a country in Schengen has nothing to do with being able to move to a different Schengen country per-se. You're thinking of the European Economic Area. Schengen is a passport-control free zone, whereas the EEA guarantees your freedom of movement between any EEA countries, regardless of whether or not you have to show your passport on arrival.
Why?
I will lol, and assume you have no Arab friends, specifically Lebanese.
The Lebanese passport, as my numerous Lebanese friends joke about, is usually ranked in the top ten worst worldwide "top 10" comedy lists. But seriously, it is on par with this metric for Somalia and other failed African states. You try going with the employed ones on business outside of the UAE, and you will see how much fun this metric can be for you.
This is her normal. She's missed connecting flights, plural, because of the increased scrutiny.
I'm expecting to be subject to all kinds of extra scrutiny myself, after I visit there later this year. I'm sure having a Lebanese entry stamp on my passport will raise plenty of eyebrows going forward.
That's true, but a lot of it is because they mirror how much the US charges their citizens. So a US tourist visa is $160 for 1 to 10 years (and between 1 and multiple stays up to six months).
So if US citizens think it is "unfair" that they have to pay more to apply for visas abroad, then ask your own government to reduce visa application fees.
It would be interesting to know what each passport image depicts or represents. I really like Sweden's passport cover. Maybe it's partly because the passport image isn't centred that makes it a bit less stuffy and official.
Others I liked: UK, Malta, Mauritius - all old-fashioned but still quite nice. In fact, all of the passports look old-fashioned with their historic emblems (although El Salvador has an outline of the country, rather than an emblem). The Swiss one is the only one that looks modern in this regard.
Or you could argue that having access to all of the seas without a passport means that the per-km2 value of a passport is actually relatively small? :)
Mine gets me to Russia, Canada, the U.S. and China.
Yours gets you to Grenada, Malta, Maldives and Saint Kitts and Nevis (ignoring the EU for a moment).
Which one is "more powerful"? Obviously mine is since I get to enjoy most of the landmass of the Northern Hemisphere while yours gets you access to a handful of minor island nations.
lists both land area and population rankings, also inverse rankings based on who can enter the country: http://www.doyouneedvisa.com/rank/border/
Another possible index would be a reverse lookup per-country, showing how many other countries can visit it without a visa. Something like a 'country freedom index' or somesuch.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Visa_req...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/Visa_req...
compare -metric AE -fuzz 5% Visa_requirements_for_British_citizens.png Visa_requirements_for_Irish_citizens.png comparison.png
http://i.imgur.com/QdCdb8r.pngthe world is a bit more complicated than your comment implies.
Me not visiting my friend more often doesn't protect a single soul. All the while, criminals with legalized money buy residencies and citizenship left and right. Tell me more about how that protects anyone even remotely.
If you really cared for equality, you'd open borders for the poor people to come and compete in a truly open and free market. Otherwise it's all just hypocrisy and exploitation.
The majority of people might not want to move state, which is fine, but they prevent other people from exercising their right to freedom of movement.
But this ends up being bad for everyone - if we are agreed that competition is good, this prevents competition between sovereign states for labour and population.
As an individual, I am stuck with whatever citizenship I was born into - and I have practically no opportunity to revoke my citizenship or try to claim a different or better citizenship. This is absolutely a derogation of a basic human right. I see it as no different morally than, for example, a caste system.
A zone of visa-free exceptions has been created in the Schengen area, but even there you'll need to apply for a work permit for longer stints (and the host country is obliged to give it to citizens of other Schengen countries, with some exceptions).
Nordic countries also have their own passport union, so a Finnish passport, for example, will let you go and work in Iceland or Norway pretty freely.
I would imagine there are be some other regions that have similiar agreements. I think that the Commonwealth at least used to have some benefits for its citizens, but I'm not sure how much of those remain.
[1] http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/moving_country/moving_a...
It also gives you information about which passports a country allows:
Where can a US passport take you: http://www.doyouneedvisa.com/passport/United%20States
Citizens of which countries are allowed to enter the US without a visa: http://www.doyouneedvisa.com/border/United%20States
It's also fascinating to see the cultural divides like 'Western world', 'Muslim world', etc based on the passport and border information.
Another interesting thing is where the Israeli passport can take you: http://www.doyouneedvisa.com/passport/israel
The border of India is surprisingly restricted: http://www.doyouneedvisa.com/border/india looks like only citizens of Nepal and Bhutan are allowed without a visa.
It lists the US as a number 1 country there (with 174 visa free countries), I guess they omit it on the free list to gather email addresses.
I think your link takes a very narrow definition into its rankings. I'm not sure how broad the index in the story is, but it seems to take into account more than just visa requirements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_requirements_for_Zimbabwean_citizens
http://www.doyouneedvisa.com/passport/ZimbabweOther things not taken into account:
* Passport weight index (how hefty is your passport? is it any good as a baton? Page count and binding are important here)
* Passport prettiness index (how dull or interesting are the blank pages in your passport)?
* Passport value index (what's the black market price for each country's passport?)
* etc etc
1/10 site woefully incomplete.
I need to start investigating the entrance requirements for myself into pretty much every country in Africa, and I have not found a convenient way to do so yet.
I have two passports, so I need to figure out which one is best in each country.
http://www.iatatravelcentre.com/
It isn't really very convenient for the use you propose (it returns info based on one passport-destination pair at a time).
Edit: and now it does show 147 again. If I remember correctly, other entries also lost ~30 from their totals.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_requirements_for_French_c... [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_requirements_for_South_Ko...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_%28document%29#Visa_polici...
States that get the most give the least.