undefined | Better HN

0 pointsscott_w1y ago0 comments

Take the effort you’re putting into trying to look edgy on the internet and instead channel it into reading and understanding what I actually wrote.

0 comments

llamaimperative1y ago

What you actually said is ridiculous:

"Your (and the sibling) responses also beg the question: must governments contract to big foreign consultancies? It's not illegal to do things in-house if they so choose, you know."

No, they don't must do this. No, it's obviously not illegal to do things in-house. They choose not to because it's obscenely hard to build what Palantir has already built and to battle test its security anything close to what Palantir has done.

(Disclaimer: I used to work there, so you can go ahead and dismiss my opinion outright, but I am responding directly to what you're saying)

scott_wOP1y ago

> They choose not to because it's obscenely hard to build what Palantir has already built and to battle test its security anything close to what Palantir has done.

While true, it also doesn’t answer legitimate concerns that the British public had that their medical data was being shared with a foreign entity that had actively participated in foreign government programmes of questionable morality.

The response to that was “all fundamental contractors have done dodgy things.”

To which you have my quoted reply. Which I’m not sure you understood at all, judging by your response.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse