> They choose not to because it's obscenely hard to build what Palantir has already built and to battle test its security anything close to what Palantir has done.

While true, it also doesn’t answer legitimate concerns that the British public had that their medical data was being shared with a foreign entity that had actively participated in foreign government programmes of questionable morality.

The response to that was “all fundamental contractors have done dodgy things.”

To which you have my quoted reply. Which I’m not sure you understood at all, judging by your response.