You pay the price. This is the price. And you better not complain.
You can either have one, or the other. But you can’t compromise one and keep the the other.
They are public servants, yes?
"To serve and to protect."
Because you might be talking to the mob boss about the weather. But the fact that you are talking to the mob boss is an extremely interesting data point. It pins you to the map in a way that you are immediately a POI and causes a file to be opened on you and your other contacts to further map your place in the network. Who talks to who is very powerful information.
"We kill people based on metadata." - General Michael Hayden, former director NSA and CIA
but if some baddies have logged into your server and sending messages as you, then DKIM can't save you
so say social media companies want a higher standard of proof that emails are coming from a particular institution, what mechanisms are available that doesn't involve onboarding every individual officer to the subtleties of public key crpyotgraphy?
but maybe you're right and this problem won't be solved because the person being harmed has no power and the institution in power sees no harm
I am wondering how they get the data back though, unless they demand it is faxed, or sent to another email address. (Or the person replying doesn't notice the different reply-to address.)
Urban legend says people have been fired after forged harassment emails were delivered this way.
Google claims this is a feature, and the sent “label” isn’t meant to mean that it came from your gmail account.
For instance, there could be a corporate service firehosing spam at coworkers on your behalf, and obviously you don’t want to notice that, so it puts it in the sent box.
There is, unfortunately, no way to get every police force on the globe to agree to some authentication scheme.