Straws are useful for drinking lemon water, and maybe other drinks which have the wrong kind of acidity that can damage tooth enamel.
The straw can help to prevent the liquid from making contact with the teeth as you're drinking.
So, there's 2 different untested theories there, I am careless spreading around without having tested either of them myself, because I have unusually strong teeth, which is an uncommon but not rare thing.
Source: https://mtpak.coffee/2023/05/takeaway-coffee-cupsforever-che...
So what I do now is not even worry about the order, but when the drinks arrive I strain out all the ice, to stop the melting and dilution process. Unfortunately I still see an appalling amount of ice displacing the volume of beverage.
Also, I have a beard, and so a straw is the best thing to prevent milk or soda or whatever soaking into my facial hair.
Currently I have a vast stockpile of plastic straws, because I usually order two drinks but use one straw. Mostly, the only sustainable, crap straws are the ones I've purchased separately.
If I’m at a restaurant or home I rarely use one. Some cocktails at a bar also benefit similarly but others just a stirrer suffices for when it comes improperly mixed.
When bartending, they’re used to taste a drink if the bartender wants to ensure it tastes right before serving.
Keeps my lips and areas around my mouth clean, so I don't waste a napkin.
Don't have to put my lips on the cup/glass, so more sanitary if eating/drinking out.
but you waste a straw instead. i don't see any net benefit wrt this particular aspect
Wait have you ever gotten an illness that was attributed to a rim of a beverage glass that wasn’t also present in the rest of the beverage?
So basically nothing new. I was actually surprised they didn't find tons of pfas in paper straws as those stuff are lined with waterproof coating. On a tangent, paper straws are a symbol of everything that's wrong with current climate politics; we have to deal with inferior products, while the actual corporations responsible are free to act with impunity. All these edicts banning stuff such as plastic straws are passed on high from the ivory towers of conventions filled with politicians and successful businessman, flown in on private jets and driven the last mile in photogenic electric cars, to talk about what the lower classes do and do not deserve to have.
Reusable bamboo/metal straws are always an option of course (or even a requirement people with for certain disabilities) but for most people throwaway straws are the most ridiculous luxury people get upset about being taken away from them.
Because banning them is highly visible and enshittifies life in general (paper straws are fucking garbage and everyone knows this) without solving the actual problem (pollution should trend downwards).
This makes environmentalists happy, because making life worse for everyone is their goal (actual progress on the problem means they lose relevance/social power and nobody ever destroys their own meal ticket); and it makes the greenwashers happy, because it makes most people think something's being done even when it isn't (and can continue to sell truthy solutions that feel good but don't work, plus the profit and power that comes from having massive capital stores in an economic context artificially driven to zero-sum with environmentalism as the excuse to impose it).
I'm all for action against excessive packaging (as long as we don't cause food waste, i.e. by banning the plastic keeping fruits and vegetables edible for much longer) but nested plastics seems to be rather rare in my experience. Even sixpacks of cans come in cardboard packaging these days. It's been months since I last saw nested plastic packaging.
I've never seen any law specifically targeting straws. Most of the laws target single-use plastics, such as plastic cutlery and plates. The people focusing on straws seem to be "the damn liberal environmentalist communists want to make your life worse" types of media.
I wonder if they are making the common mistake of searching for fluoride and assuming it must be a PFAS.
Additionally, PFAS surface coatings are often intentionally applied to glass to make it more hydro or oleophobic. [5] It stands to reason that PFAS could either be applied on purpose to glass straws, ('easy clean!') or for some other product in the same factory.
[1]: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/sept_2020_pfas_samp...
[2]: https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse/investigations/samplin...
[3]: https://www.mass.gov/doc/field-sampling-guide-for-pfas/downl...
[4]: https://epaz.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/Conference/2-D1-13...
Meaning they are not being careful to distinguish between PFAS as included by the manufacturer, and PFAS that comes later.
So all the PFAS they found - is that just PFAS from the local water supply? If so the entire research is called into question.
(I highly doubt glass straws are being marketed as easy clean - the coating doesn't stay, you have to reapply it, so I doubt they would bother spending that money on straws for something temporary.)
I see no issue with plastic straws that are then used by peaker electric plants.
Myself, I prefer metal straws, with came also with a tool to clean them.