I don’t make a living as a writer but writing has made my living. Here’s my advice to improve as a writer in general, not as a writer of a specific genre or purpose, and not to improve a specific piece of writing.
0. All advice needs salt.
1. Recognize that all writing is personal and all reading is subjective. No one has a perfect lens. Be willing to be wrong. Even if you’re right, guaranteed someone else thinks you’re wrong.
2. Are you writing to be authentic or writing to be popular? Writing to persuade or to inspire? To amuse or confront? All of those may be in conflict at times. Recognize and accept the conflict, then make your choices in peace. See rule #1.
3. Everyone loves simple language.
4. But try not to be bland. This is the value of rhythm, voice, word choice, tropes and schemes, idioms, patterns, and so on.
5. There really is something to copying other people’s writing as a way of finding your own writing voice. So you need to read widely to find people worth copying. In general, avoid the angry advice writers.
6. Practice. Click the Publish button once in a while. You don’t end up pitching for the Yankees by reading about baseball.
7. Writing is pretty fantastic, isn’t it?
8. Language evolves. Just like foxes and toaster ovens. Accept it. Thank people for their critique of your apparent misuse of language and then please continue challenging the rules.
9.
10. Leave something to the imagination. Think of it like an offering to the gods.
11. No one cares about your writing as much as you do. See rule #1.
> No literary quality can be attained by reading writers who possess it: be it, for example, persuasiveness, imagination, the gift of drawing comparisons, boldness or bitterness, brevity or grace, facility of expression or wit, unexpected contrasts, a laconic manner, naïveté, and the like. But if we are already gifted with these qualities—that is to say, if we possess them potentia—we can call them forth and bring them to consciousness; we can discern to what uses they are to be put; we can be strengthened in our inclination, nay, may have courage, to use them; we can judge by examples the effect of their application and so learn the correct use of them; and it is only after we have accomplished all this that we actu possess these qualities. This is the only way in which reading can form writing, since it teaches us the use to which we can put our own natural gifts; and in order to do this it must be taken for granted that these qualities are in us. Without them we learn nothing from reading but cold, dead mannerisms, and we become mere imitators.
Gutenberg link: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/11945/11945-h/11945-h.htm#li...
It implies we are born with some sort of immutable value locked inside of us, which I disagree with.
I think I agree with it. Most people have a natural intelligence or artistic capability or instinctive talent or natural athleticism that cannot be learned and cannot be taught, but that can be acquired by diligent perseverance in practice and effort.
Naturally strong people often do now realize how strong they are compared to the standard. Naturally smart people often mistakenly assume that everyone else is equally as intelligent and that their intelligence is nothing special.
Our brains tend to normalize our everyday experience so that the extraordinary stands out more against the background of life.
Nothing is impossible for anyone, but some things will be easier or harder for you because of how they fit with your natural inclinations, abilities, or skills.
We often do not appreciate how vague we are and how many biases we embed in our writing until we read them again outside of our current mindset.
This is why portant emails should be composed, and then wait until later before re-reading.
You will often find yourself rewriting entire communications because your original message was unclear/emotional/combative/etc...
Not sure if intentional, but if so this was a fantastic way to emphasize your point!
Charles Bukowski On Writing
Kurt Vonnegut Letters
These books aren’t so much about how to write better but more so a look into the minds of two good authors. Helped me get over some of the hurdles of writing. Probably not very useful if you’re looking to be an improved work document writer but for creative writing they were great.
The common theme being simplicity and informal, but correct, speech.
Try it. Read its
[1] https://www.websters1913.com/
[2] https://boingboing.net/2014/05/29/you-should-try-the-1913-we...
The book I read was Mosley, "This is the Year You Write Your Novel".
I guess his message is to not be aggrieved when one’s writing seems like sh*t. That observation might be the start of a good piece of writing.
Alternatively there's the quip of Oscar Wilde: “I was working on the proof of one of my poems all the morning, and took out a comma. In the afternoon I put it back again.”
I use it a lot for long articles that I've already spent far too much time editing to help me catch sentences that could be broken up for clarity.
Here are instructions for how to set this up for macOS users: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mApa60zJA8rgEm6T6GF0yIem...
Note that I didn't say it'll turn any writer into a good writer. It'll turn them into a better one. A good writer could become great and a terrible writer can become slightly less terrible. It's all subjective.
One thing I've learned is that some people have a way with words and some just don't. And there's nothing wrong with that. But all of us need to write at some point and that book will definitely help because it helps the person focus on what's most important to the story rather than what's the most important to the writer.
[1] https://bryanafern.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/on-writing-ra...
>Carver had been up all night reviewing Lish’s severe editorial cuts––two stories had been slashed by nearly seventy per cent, many by almost half; many descriptions and digressions were gone; endings had been truncated or rewritten––and he was unnerved to the point of desperation.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220617140639/http://www.newyor...
I have read dozens and dozens of books on writing, and for non-fiction nothing beats Writing with Style by Trimble.
[1]https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2180265.Reader_s_Digest
Read it if you feel you must, but lower your expectations.
https://education.economist.com/courses/professionalcommunic...
Ugly cookie popup was the first thing I read.
Then some big ads at the top and sides begged for my attention.
Next was the paywall box selling me some complicated subscription deal.
Dreaming of a world wide web that cherishes writing.
I've worked with editors at Fast Company, Entrepreneur, TheNextWeb and others, and I have not _ever_ tried to read a book to make myself a better writer. What does that even mean?
And on numerous occasions I have gotten away with submitting first drafts that get published "as is" without anyone telling me otherwise. Am I some omnipotent writer, or were the editors incompetent? I doubt it.
I think what a lot of people also don't understand about writing is that some of the best work out there (articles, books, etc.), for the person who put it out - it can be compared to having participated in a triathlon because it has THAT immense of an effect on your mental state of being.
Want to be a better writer? Find out what your passion is and write about that. No book and no order of semicolons is going to make you "better" unless what you write about is what lights the fire underneath your feet.
If someone hones their craft such that they become more effective at articulating their thoughts, at making their argument more persuasive, at moving their audience, at reaching more people, wouldn’t we say that they’ve become a better writer than they used to be?
That's fine if your goal is to become a Writer. However if writing is just the means to the end of communicating an idea or persuading an audience, then it may not be possible to align your passion. That doesn't make improving your technique any less important or achievable though.
There's no consideration for the absolute basic level of entry to writing, and it imposes on the person an unrealistic perspective which may lead that person on a meaningless journey on "becoming" something that they are inherently not able to become.
Hence me mentioning higher education. I'm well aware of people who are absolute artists with words, but that same story can be said/explained in practical ways.
Perhaps I should have made that clearer.
That you bring up education and vocabulary suggests that you do think there's such a thing as better writers. One obvious example: compare a given three-year-old to you. You are almost certainly a better writer. Compare you at three years old to today. Same story.
Sure, you may be right that passion is required. But why dismiss skill?
That being said, achieving clarity often requires tremendous effort.