UPDATE: My bad, there are plenty of pictures in the supplemental materials downloadable further down the page
https://live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au/d2a49c29f981d0a8...
Image description: Filaments of a bacteria named Thiomargarita magnifica, placed next to a dime for scale. It is the largest bacteria ever observed, and each filament seen here is a single cell.
The trouble is that when writers are discussing scientific research, they could be sued if they use the images in the article without permission.
There needs to be an easy way to revenue share with publishers when these copyrighted images are used. It would definitely be a win-win scenario.
This is one of those cases where the genetic material is repeated multiple times inside the same "organism". It would be considered to be a filament made up of multiple cells, except that there isn't anything separating the individual cells, so it's technically "one cell".
It's like roping together 200 boats and claiming that you've created a mile long boat. You sort of did, but it's not really the first thing people think of when they see that phrase.
Either way, it's not exactly blech.
Or maybe the chromosomes are spatially optimal in a centimeter long rod.
Or maybe it's evolved to suppress the genes/proteins that would be excessive if it had 3 working copies being transcripted repeatedly.
This made my day, thanks.
This somehow feels like a multicellular organism that didn't quite make the jump that other eukaryotes did.
[edit]
An answer's here: http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2315138
No taste aside from slightly salty. The texture was a turn off as well. I would compare it to eating Ulva straight from the culture tank. I suggest Red Ogo with a crisp texture and a slightly salty cucumber flavor. I also use it as the last ingredient in chevichee, before the lemon juice begins to break down the texture
My pic: https://photos.app.goo.gl/1SfckUMzt4Qp5Ymy5
divers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06bvGXtmcMI
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27512390/
history: http://blogs.dailybreeze.com/history/2010/06/02/white-point-...
What do you think internment camps usually are? “Concentration camp” would be accurate, though it's problematic because the use of that as a euphemism for the Nazi extermination camps tends to get people to view it as misuse when it is used in its original and literal sense.
And “concentration camp” similarly means “the place the Germans put Jewish people (and other groups).”
I don’t think one word is inherently more intense than the other. The difference in how I think about the two is mainly down to what happened in the camps. Both were evil places where the government imprisoned innocent people. Only the Nazis were killing everyone.
Another possibility would be some kind of crystals growing from sulfur and covered in bacteria.
We need and electronic microscope image here and hystological cuts stained with gram.
(from NYT, https://archive.ph/ET2tc )
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2325909-largest-known-b...
(Previous coverage discussing the preprint: https://www.science.org/content/article/largest-bacterium-ev... )