"'Nu’ is too easily confounded with `new,’ and `Xi’ was not used because it is a common last name”, the WHO said, adding that the agency’s “best practices for naming disease suggest avoiding `causing offence to any cultural, social, national, regional, professional or ethnic groups’".
"Omicron" and all manner of misspellings are going to be way easier to search for.
:tw_flag:There’s no previously hard and fast rule or principle being broken here, nor is the world worse off because the Greek alphabet is merely being used as a source of neutral names rather than being followed exactly linearly.
I feel that anyone saying it’s a bad thing that Xi was skipped is probably doing so because they feel it would be edgy & funny or something China deserves, and not for any actual scientific credibility perspective.
> adding that the agency’s “best practices for naming disease suggest avoiding `causing offence to any cultural, social, national, regional, professional or ethnic groups.”’
The list does not include brands.
Also, there are different measures of confusion: "Nu" being confused with "new" is on a phonetic level and could make actual communication difficult. "Delta (the virus)" vs "Delta (the airline)" is semantic confusion and most people are quite capable of distinguishing those unless they deliberately want to be confused.
It’s not about whether the names can be linked to a real world entity. That’s going to be true for all of these in some way. But about what causes severe enough confusion or controversy to hamper things.
One is a brand, the other is a world leader with nukes in a country our previous president was regularly stoking racism against. There’s also been a massive influx of Asian hate crimes since president Jyyynah & coronavirus.
I do not recall hearing many crimes against delta airlines because of any conspiracy theories involving them.
Bending over backwards to avoid offending people isn't good policy, because it just lowers the bar for what makes people offended.
The pronunciation of Xi isn't as well-known anyway, Omicron is better in conversations.
[1] I don't really know if this is a family name for anyone outside of the Chinese and overseas Chinese communities
But Xi is a pretty common surname in China, and the virus has already caused enough hatred towards Asians in general, there's no point in fueling it even more.
Just doing some ad-hoc lookup showed me that here are at-least over 700,000 People with "Xi" as the last name. Not including quite similar names like "Xié".
Sure that there is a certain very powerful person with that name, probably mattered in making them rethink if they should use it. Still there being over half a Million people with that name is a sound argument anyway.
It’s better that people learn some Greek letters.
Both VOIs and VOCs get Greek letter names.
"Hey, are you worried about the nu variant?"
"No, I'm worried about the new variant."
"I knew you knew about the nu one, but about the new one I didn't know you knew."
"Yeah, the nu one is not the new one. I'm also concerned about any that are newer than the new one."
"I knew the new one was newer than the nu one, but is there one that's newer than the new one?"
"Wish I knew. Guess ioata find out."
I assume this is because ancient Greeks spell the phonetic version of the letter as “νῦ”. The second of those letters is “υ” (upsilon) which in Greek sounds like “e” when put after a consonant.
WHO should have used Chinese characters, would have been more fun.
Or numbers -v1, -v2 etc. Or semver (1.3, 1.4, 2, ...).
The current naming is not even pronounced currently (at least in France), omicron is prononced with o.n at the end (the English way) instead of the french way (on being a single sound). I have no idea why, given that everyone here loses their shit evertime English is nibbling on French.
Lastly, this notion that things that offend must not be spoken even if there is a rational reason for them (like just being the next in the alphabet) is a dangerous precedent. The political left will probably welcome it, because much of their social justice causes are built on this type of sentiment. But seeing trusted institutions practice the same ideology is creepy and a dystopian distortion of reality.
Just want to snuff that out: https://www.who.int/news/item/08-05-2015-who-issues-best-pra...