undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbobbylarrybobby5y ago0 comments

Scheme is great. It has basically no syntax to bog you down and you can focus solely on the algorithm side of programming.

0 comments

4 comments · 2 top-level

chriszhang5y ago· 2 in thread

I came here to say the same thing. A lot of the discussion with modern languages focus around syntax. Why not use a Lisp which has very minimal syntax and focus on solving problems instead?

Do you have an opinion about Common Lisp? I know that Scheme is more minimal and cleaner but since you recommend Scheme I want to know what your opinion about Common Lisp is.

pjmlp5y ago

Not the OP, Common Lisp relates to the genesis of IDEs alongside Smalltalk, as such it has a very good developer experience, alongside native compilation, which can only be fully appreciated when using the surviving commercial offerings.

retrac5y ago

Yes, I answered the question from a very different angle (Pascal or Lua) but my motivation was also avoiding the learner from drowning in syntactic details. Scheme would be even better than that.

pjmlp5y ago

And good native code compilers to choose from.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse