I'll fix it.
> Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem. All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them going again. I trust you are not in too much distress.
British Airways Flight 9, from London Heathrow to Auckland, 24 June 1982.
'November' is US-Centric.
(for many airliners: https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=755373 )
You could then calc the downtime that the planes get for maint/cleaning/etc...
I dont really know flight numbers off the top of my head[1], it might be helpful to add a top 10 searches or pick of the day type feature. Some way to see something without knowing specific information.
[1] i can't be bothered to google flight numbers, but i will spend 10x the time writing this comment.
Obviously, you're ridiculously safe on any given airplane. Even as someone in the industry I can't believe the safety numbers myself at times.
Around 100,000.
You'll be ok.
However, I'd like to see the option of choosing a date or date range, if that was possible. I might want to go back further than just one or two weeks, for example.
Tail numbers are unique; flight numbers are not.
Data is coming from the FlightAware API.
Speaking of grounding the 737 MAX, I should probably ground that antenna...
On top of that, some airlines like Qantas name their planes (e.g. you'll have an A330 named Cradle Mountain). I'm not sure that the mappings are publicly available but maybe it can be crowdsourced.
E.G. https://whatsmyaircraft.com/#UAL123 -- would immediately load the data for UAL123.
United.com says UA 2190 is a Boeing 737-900.
Right now UA 2190 is from Chicago to Palm Springs.
Next week it’s from Houston to San Antonio.
The schedule you see is originally created by the airlines with some days in advance
But even if Google didn't tell me that immediately before booking, I wouldn't be able to get it from FlightAware data (via your site or otherwise) because airlines don't seem to post it there more than a few days in advance. And besides, since I'm a plane geek I tend to look stuff up directly on FlightAware or FlightRadar24 all the time (I live right under the final approach to a very busy airport so I often go there just to see where the planes over my head have come from!), so I'm not sure what value you're adding by giving a tiny subset of the data that is available there for free anyway.
But still, as I said, I think it's great work if this is just for learning or demo purposes, well done. If you wanted to provide a bit of a usability improvement, I would second one of the comments below that suggests you shouldn't need to ask for the name of the airline if people supply the full flight number, i.e. with the letter prefix. That's the format that people will have on their tickets/booking emails etc, and it's actually a tiny cognitive load to mentally convert "OS264" into "Austrian Airlines" dropdown followed by "264" without the prefix; the clever part, for you of course, would be to convert the airline prefixes as used in ticketing and airport displays (OS, LH etc) to those that are used in the routing data (OS->AUA, LH->DLH etc).
Now if you could make an app that tells me exactly where to find free water refills at any airport after going through security, then I'd be happy :-)
I have ExpertFlyer for that, but that's a paid subscription. Or I could fiddle with FlightAware's crappy UI. But having a neat tool that tells me immediately is cool.
As for why I care? Different planes often have different seats and in business class it can make a world of difference. Fly United's 777-300ER with the Polaris seats, or 777-200 with the "coffin seats" and you'll get a sense for why knowing the `-300ER` suffix makes a huge difference.
[1] - https://github.com/jpatokal/openflights/blob/master/data/air...
I tried other services, including: - https://aviation-edge.com/premium-api/ - https://developer.flightstats.com/
Yes, other sites have been providing this, but I think this stands a chance of ranking well in the future when people search for what their aircraft is, and with good reason: it does that one thing without distraction. Especially on tiny phone screens, minimalism is a huge feature. Bonus points for reacting quickly to a media hype.