There is a channel in pretty much every company, large or small, for reporting copyright violations and other legal complaints. That channel is the legal department (in the US, the DMCA contact point), not the customer service department. If you want a company to actually take action, you have to get the right people involved.
In Amazon's case, it's right here: https://www.amazon.com/report/infringement
If you complain to the wrong people, expect a suboptimal response. They're not trained to help in these cases, and don't always have the authority to short-circuit the bureaucratic process like the legal department does.
As the author posted a screenshot of, you get an email reply after some time saying something to the effect of "We have reviewed and removed the content"
...except, nothing was removed. The infringing content is still there. The exact same thing happened to me. Same exact email.
Edit, here's my email from Amazon: https://i.imgur.com/mzXycfk.jpg -- nothing was actually removed.
Unfortunately this is the downside of being an IP rights holder - policing is a PITA. (Amazon, do their credit, does offer a brand registry, but that protects against trademark infringement, not copyright infringement.)
In your case, assuming they did not do exactly what they said they would do (remove the infringing content from the specific listing page referred to by the ASIN), I'd have your attorney send a takedown notice to the following address:
Copyright Agent
Amazon Legal Department
P.O. Box 81226
Seattle, WA 98108
If your content is on multiple product listings, you'll need to identify each ASIN.PS: I haven't read the OP yet since it's behind Facebook login.
Expecting all customers of a company to be magically educated about the proper channel for copyright complaints is much less realistic imo.
A company making profit from counterfeits making counterfeit reporting unintuitive sounds a bit suspicious.
If amazon can deliver a million packages a day, they should damn well be able to forward a complaint to the department it belongs in. What a joke.
At any rate, if you’re an IP rights holder, knowing how to deal with violations is table stakes for your legal representative. Googling “amazon copyright notice” gives you the correct page link near the top of the first results page.
This isn’t a mom and pop store. This isn’t a company that can’t figure out logistics. This is amazon. If they don’t forward these complaints to the right place of their own volition, then they aren’t working hard enough to abide by the law. Fair is fair. Corporations need some responsibility to go with all their privileges.
If you’re tired of chasing an infringer, why don’t you hire an attorney to engage Amazon’s legal department? You might end up with a more satisfactory result than by constantly playing “whack-a-mole” with reporting individual listings. You can also separately report a seller by following the instructions here: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/gp/help/external/help.html?...
Customer Obsession: Leaders start with the customer and work backwards. They work vigorously to earn and keep customer trust. Although leaders pay attention to competitors, they obsess over customers.
What a joke.
Does the average customer care more about saving $10 or protecting someone's copyright? I'd argue given the how prevalent copyright infringement by people has been that they'd rather save $10. So Amazon is doing exactly what customers want which is cheap goods irrespective of everything else.
They’re already losing my business.
Unfortunately, trademark law in most jurisdictions allows manufacturers to effectively prohibit importing and selling goods obtained cheaply overseas and reselling them in direct competition with ‘legitimate’ distributors.
This allows manufacturers to engage in price differentiation, to the detriment of consumers. As with most IP law it mainly serves to enrich those in a position to exploit it.
The kirtsaeng v Wiley supreme Court case affirmed the right of sellers to import international versions of textbooks for resale in the US. This resulted in a reversal of Omega watches v Costco where Omega had argued that Costco couldn't resell their watches in the US.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley_%26_....
From the thread, it looked like the support representatives engaged with the person complaining on Facebook, reported some items had been removed in the past based on takedown requests. That's pretty responsive, all in all. Maybe the artist could enlist some additional help discovering and helping him and other affected artists report for takedown the items that this seller is offering so they'd eventually . Or they could gather some funds and sue Amazon.
From reviewing the thread the artist posted, it appears that's why he's frustrated - that fakes keep re-appearing, and Amazon is asking him to jump through hoops again, even though his authorship had been established.
So, no - I don't feel it's reasonable to ask the author to enlist people to help him police the marketplace, Amazon can easily solve this problem (future infringement) with technology.
2. Some counterfeiter creates a listing with an infringing copy of the book.
3. DMCA request is filed and the listing is taken down and the account is banned.
4. Someone else buys a legitimate copy of my book and creates a listing for it on Amazon.
What should Amazon do?
You can clearly see the artist's signature cut-off in the bottom left of the image. Here it is on the artist's website as well:
https://tsevis.com/editorial-illustration-2016-2017?fbclid=I...
Result: $14000 pair of socks
$9000 tube of toothpaste
$3800 package of rubber bands
$1000 usb-c cable
$45000 water bottle.
Curious why Amazon can't fix this. It makes them look like they have zero control, zero trustworthiness, a scam site. Note I don't normally choose to sort that way but those items with those prices show up in my regular searches quite often
But yeah...you'd think Amazon would have some sort of sanity filter.
Sometimes when sellers don't want a particular Asin to sell temporarily they will raise the price to something insane instead of deactivating the listing.
I agree it does look janky.
(The many stories about people receiving goods over a year after they were ordered and long after they were assumed to have been lost and refunded are not lying.)
Take a quick search for headphones by "Apple", I doubt any of these are genuinely Apple: https://smile.amazon.co.uk/s/s/ref=sr_nr_p_89_0?fst=as%3Aoff...
The problem is it's more profitable not to care about these problems.