Rationally sized phones
No gimmicks
Few model numbers
After Steve Jobs Phablet sized phones
Gimmicks everywhere (Animoji, AR, etc..)
Lots of confusing model numbers
Basically Apple has become like every other phone manufacturer. It goes to show how much a good leader at the top of a company matters. I will keep using a SE for the foreseeable future. Fits in my hand
Cheap to self replace screen/battery
Has a headphone jackI'm very disappointed they didn't use the edge-to-edge screen ability to reduce the physical size and keep the screen size the same. A 4.7 inch screen in an iPhone X design would be perfect for me. It would be barely bigger than the SE with a much bigger screen.
That's only marginally larger than the iPhone SE's 4.0" screen.
I use an iPhone SE, but only because it was ~AU$400 cheaper than the 4.7" iPhone 8.
Edit: I'd like to be on the record as having said I think these large screen size phones are, for my use case anyway, ridiculous. I work in a metal fabrication workshop and have to have my phone on me. There's no way a 5.8" phone is going to last more than a month in my pocket.
You can not extend a smartphone and give feature like OLED, Neural Engine etc without considering affect on the battery.
They want bigger device to solve many those issues. If they release the iPhone SE update they can not compete with other iPhones in terms of feature and performance.
Also it have huge involvement of iOS updates also. When they release iOS update you have to think all the device these updates support else people will make noises.
The reason I don't totally discount the SE is the effective lowering of prices by Apple in the new line-up. They clearly want to grow on the lower end of the price band now.
I would want to go back to stock Android after I retire this SE, but when I look around I don't really see a decent 4 inch stock Android phone either.
Bad idea for whom, and why? Because of your personal preference for a smaller phone? Clearly, the market doesn't agree. Well TBH, I don't know the market numbers, but surely Apple doesn't cull their lineup of products that are selling well?
You'll have to remove my SE from my cold, dead hands. It's not just one handed operation, it's simply a much better size and I'm yet to see any reason I'd want a bigger one.
https://www.sonymobile.com/us/products/phones/#filter= (ctrl+F for "compact").
There will be a thriving SE market on eBay.
Secondary actions may still require a second hand, but most primary actions should not.
You do that in an indirect manner, by requiring NFC, thus eliminating 4-inch phones, which don't have NFC: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/De... (Cmd-F nfc). If Apple had updated the iPhone SE with NFC, this trick wouldn't work any more, and I'd be forced to do UX design for 4-inch phones.
Till I find product-market fit, I don't want to be distracted by overhead like this.
Not being able to replace my current distract-o-phone with another comfortably-sized one might be the thing that convinces me to give the new Nokia bananaphone a try.
I do admit however I would have liked to see an X in the same size as a base 8.
Is that necessarily bad? Up to a point, the more meme-ing and acrimony around your brand, the better. "There's no such thing as bad publicity."
I sold it this past summer to someone who has yet to do anything with it. I'm honestly wondering now if it was Apple who bought it.
Even when it was the post-Jobs Ive and Cook it was still captivating, but this is just tiresome.
The iPhone announcements were, I agree, quite tiresome. So much so, I closed the window a few minutes into Schiller's discussion of the chips in the new models.
I suspect it's because I can only do so much with a phone and nothing in the "smartphone" space jumps out to me as "revolutionary". It seems that innovational leaps in mobile computing will depend on what software becomes available.
Nothing in todays announcement makes me want to upgrade my current iPhoneX. Better graphics on a tiny screen? Yawn. The basketball tracker demo was neat, but those are very specific use cases.
The Apple Watch looks like it is really coming into its own. They should have closed with that.
EDIT
You know what would have really blown the doors off the one more thing? If the iPhone Xr started at $499. That's how you grow the market.
Especially the exaggerated adjectives. Everything's "gorgeous," "beautiful," or "stunning," even if it's just a featureless black slab like every other phone for the last 5 years.
Previously he's felt a bit dry at times.
Reminds me of Fury Road: "I had a baby brother! And he was perfect in every way!"
For people with aging parents that don't really use mobile phones, I could many watches purchased as safety devices. (Though the battery life doesn't make it ideal for that...)
[1] https://www.getqardio.com/qardiocore-wearable-ecg-ekg-monito...
For anyone who wants to dig deeper, Asymco has regularly discussed the life-spans and growth of the Apple eco-system. Latest related post: http://www.asymco.com/2018/03/01/determining-the-average-app...
In the same section she said they were already using recycled tin in the control boards, and their recycling programme had been improved too.
To be honest the sustainability part was the most impressive of the whole keynote, and is a reason I'll continue to be a loyal Apple customer.
EDIT: sounds like it's just the new iPhones. But it includes the less expensive Xr.
[0] - https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/focos/id1274938524?mt=8
I don't think it was mentioned in the keynote, and I hope it isn't just a software flag like what they did with Live Photos on the iPhone 6S:
https://www.theverge.com/2015/10/15/9546639/3d-touch-live-ph...
Is there something I'm not seeing? This seems like a lot of money to front just to get into the device I really want but at the same time having to deal with something I don't want, plus 2 monthly plans.
Edit/update:
So as it stands now, $749 for an iPhone XR, roughly $80/month plan, $499 for GPS + Cellular watch, and $10/month for watch (based on current series 3 watch plan).
That basically breaks down to $1250 plus taxes in upfront costs to get access to a device that, for me anyway, has more useful utility to it than the phone, plus over $100/month (again, after taxes) just so I can utilize the full feature set of said watch.
I mean, still a lot of money for a watch you want, but I don't think you'd need to spend quite so much if you didn't want to.
Refurb iPhone7 is $379 (USA only) There are cheaper plans than $80. Do you need cellular watch?
I have an iphone 6+ and I will probably not upgrade to a new phone but get the series 4 GPS watch.
If Apple is shipping 7nm in iPhones, that's actually incredible.
Edit: After doing a bit of research, it seems like Intel is actually the odd duck out and TSMC is doing the fab on these chip runs as well as the fab on Huawei's new chip with dual Neural Processing Units. It's actually just Intel that's failing to produce smaller and smaller chips (again, TSMC is producing 7nm for this Apple run as well as Huawei's new chip).
7nm on a (relatively) small ARM is also a different world to 7nm on a chip the size of the latest Intel's.
Actually Global Foundries just announced they are abandoning 7nm for the short term.
Source: I worked on a fall detection app for the Apple Watch last year.
I think it's more the other way around. To the extent that it is marketed and used as a medical device, it has to be FDA approved.
That said, I don't think I'd recommend using it for an ECG instead of going to the hospital. "Approved" medical devices are not, of course, all of the same quality.
This is what I am afraid of. People might think that buying a watch will replace visit with a cardiologist (or even using professional home holter) to make a serious ECG measurement (not 30s one, but full 24h scan).
Is beer proofing that different from regular waterproofing? I can imagine juice leaving sugar residue and being sticky. Does beer have similar issues?
Sigh. It's enough to make me nostalgic for Windows Phone.
Even within the Android ecosystem, it's very sad that innovation is stymied. The only ones that even try are LG and they always fall flat.
There's a long list of different Android phones I'd like to see:
- Keyboard / Accessible phones. My mother in law has some disabilities that prevent her from using a touch-phone and she's using an Android phone with keyboard for messaging. Once it breaks, I'll be hard pressed to find a replacement
- Small size phones with decent specs. Lots of people are very vocal about that, a current coworker spent a lot of time searching and got frustrated, the only small phones available were basically dumbphones
- Specialist phones, I can't believe we still don't have phones with physical camera button and better swappable lenses (I think Sony tried that one, and there are some add-ons).
Sure there are a lot more undeserved niches.
Face ID is fine, but multiplexing so many different features on to the single, poorly-placed, side button has been a huge negative for me.
The side button is way too easy to hit when the device is in your pocket, and when that happens you're activating Siri, or Apple Pay, or some accessibility shortcut, or you're taking a screenshot, or you're activating emergency mode.
I've lost count of the number of times I've pulled my iPhone X from pocket to find that the screen is on, Siri is waiting for a command, and the accessibility menu is on screen.
And when I actually need to take a screenshot, or shutdown the device, I can never remember the actual key combination. It's such a mess.
Conversely, touch id was perfect. I could just put any one of my registered fingers on the button and it'd more or less instantly open up. I didn't have to look at the phone, I didn't have to pose. It just worked. Face id is a terrible step back, and now there's no option but older phones if you want touch id. I got the touch bar MBP just so I could have touch id on it too, it's great.
I was really stoked about the iPhone X when it was announced, ordered it the second it became available. I didn't like it very much at first but figured maybe it just took some getting used to, but now after a year I honestly think it's a step back. Was waiting for a new iPhone 8 style device, with touch id, but since they've given up on that I guess I just have to get an 8 or get used to the new selfie normal and weird overloaded touch gestures everywhere.. sigh
"Available at authorized resellers"
Lie. I'm writing this comment on a Vivo Nex and I have been using this for months.
And this isn't done through ML trickery.
Are apple stores considered a "facility"?
Because, I cant see how the apple store in the Valley Fair Mall can get its own apple-power feed?
Anyway, no matter how you define a "core", GPU core counts don't matter except when comparing different SKUs of the same µarch.
Unfortunately, I’m not sure about how the actual numbers measure up though.
Is "super" just a reference to the increased color gamut and true tone functionality?
Going from >300ppi to >400ppi probably warrants a special mention.
- XR $749
- XS $999
- XS Max $1099
Yikes. And that's for the lowest storage available.
EDIT (all prices US): for the big one:
256: $1249
512: $1499
Little one:
256: $1149
512: $1349
R:
128: $799
256: $899
The AliveCor Kardia has been available for a while. I got one for a family member with atrial fibrillation issues and it works really well and sticks on the back of their cell phone.
It looks like they pulled this off pretty well too, although sales numbers in the coming months will tell the true story. In one generation they went from, "pay $999 to upgrade to the higher end option (the X)," to, "pay $999 for our regular phone or downgrade to the XR."
[1] https://p-events-delivery.akamaized.net/189kljhbasdcvjhasbds...
Since I switched from PCs to Macs, I've purchased (not in order):
PowerBook G3 (Pismo) - My first Apple device that started my love affair PowerBook G4 12" MacBook Pro 12" MacBook Pro 15" Power Mac G5 (with ACD) Mac Pro (with ACD) iPod (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th gen) iPod Mini (1st, 2nd, 3rd gen) iPod Shuffle (1st, 3nd, 4th gen) iPod Touch (forget which gen) iPhone (Original, 3G, 3GS, 4S, 5S, 6S) iPad (Original, iPad 2, iPad Mini, iPad Pro) Apple Watch (3) Apple TV (multiple)
And countless Apple products for family (three or four Mac Minis over the years for parents, iPhones, iPods, etc.)
It's a shame because NOTHING Apple offers is of interest to me. Like you said, I don't want a giant phablet (remember when Apple fans mocked those?? "But I can use my phone with one hand!" we all said mockingly)
I'm not even sure if they're listening to their "pro" customers when it comes to "pro" hardware (or if pro customers are even a demographic Apple wants to cater to?)
Unfortunately, I've started looking at non-Apple devices. (The Lenovo ThinkPad P1 is what I want in a laptop. I'm still not sold on any particular iPhone replacement, yet...) But, nearly 20 years of my life, I've called myself an Apple "fan". So it's tough. I don't know, maybe I'm just not the target demographic =\ I realize I'm just one person (who use to buy Apple products for six other people - all family), so my move from Mac -> PC wouldn't affect Apple's bottom line. But, I'd like to think that there are others out there like us, who are getting fed up with Apple of today.
Sorry for the long rant (that's slightly humblebrag-ish, I don't mean for it to be...)
I don't play AR games (and I'm disappointed nobody seems to have found an AR killer app. Those games are so lame.
Star constellation recognition is nice, but doesn't excite anyone anymore. But practical uses? Just today I was standing on the beach wondering whether the town in the distance was town A or town B (or if town A is maybe behind the curve). The phone knows my location, my bearing and has a map. It could label POI in display. That's the most practical use I can come up with right now, and I doubt I need the bazillion times improvement in their ML coprocessor for that.
I'm in the market for an iPhone right now. The event didn't wow me enough to really get comfortable with that kind of money.
But will I resist the voices in my head that say that the 7 and 8 are old? I was hoping for a price drop for the original X.
I'm going to use my iPhone SE until it no longer works. I don't want bigger phones, and I'll vote with my dollars.
I'm also in the market for a MacBook Pro, but the touch bar is not something I'm interested in at the expense of the function keys. We should be able to get the best of Apple hardware, but not at a compromise.
Perhaps its a software and bloat issue, but the only noticeable thing improvements have been better pictures and I can read more on a single page-view, but everything else seems exactly the same.
The new phones are pretty damned expensive though. nearly a thousand bucks where I live for the 256gig version of the XR, and the iPhone Excess is a good 1600USD after taxes in my area.
Just too damn expensive.
This is sad.
512GB storage, what to do with that? Perhaps long-form video.
Cook wearing white shoes after Labor Day, tsk tsk.
Recommend Ars Technica live blog.