Why do people use VMware workstation over virtualbox?
With VMware Workstation that feature is super fast. The product has a much better experience overall.
Unfortunately, I didn't have much luck with Vagrant's VMware plugin (paid) and couldn't realistic make the switch.
It seems using each OS's native virtualization (Hyper-V, xhyve, KVM) is the way to go, but that means we have to maintain separate vagrant boxes, which we don't have to with VMware/VirtualBox since they work on Linux/OSX/Windows.
You can of course install whatever remote server you want inside the VM but aside from that you can connect to a VM directly using VRDP.
But you can also manager your entire virtualbox instance using RemoteBox ( http://remotebox.knobgoblin.org.uk/about.cgi ) or from a web GUI using phpVirtualBox ( https://sourceforge.net/p/phpvirtualbox/wiki/Home/ ).
I'm sure there are other options as well.
This is a maintenance release. The following items were fixed and/or added:
* GUI: translation updates
* GUI: Fixed double mouse cursor when using mouse integration without Guest Additions, actually a Qt 5.6 bug fixed with QT 5.6.3 (Mac OS X hosts only; bug #15610)
* Solaris hosts: allow increasing MTU size for host-only adapter to 9706 bytes to support jumbo frames
* Linux hosts: glibc 2.26 compile fix
* Windows Additions: 3D related crash fix (bugs #17082, #17092)
That said, the UI polish isn't as nice or intuitive as VirtualBox.