How could it possibly be irrelevant? We're talking about countless millions of dollars (over time) of other people's money being used here. Why would anyone work hard to get himself into a position to decide who gets it, if there was nothing in it for him?
You want more regulation, but what exactly do you want the laws to say? If there's no problem with quality, what is the problem?
If the problem is just that you personally don't like X, Y and Z, then there is no real problem.
Well if you like to believe EVERYBODY in local administration is corrupted - your choice. I don't think so. Just like I don't think every programmer that writes software for banks - plants logic bombs and backdoors.
> If there's no problem with quality, what is the problem?
There is a problem with esthethic. I think I was clear about that. There is a problem with prioritising cars over everything else. Parking lots and 3-lane roads dividing city into small non-walkable parts. People escaping to suburbs. Growing traffic jams and growing commute times caused by that.
Quality isn't a problem, because there are strict laws about it. And it's quite easy to control. And people don't like to live in houses that can fall apart, or that are badly insulated, when it can be -20 C in winter and +35 C in summer.
On the other hand they have no issues with living in ugly city, designed as a drive-through. Or if they do - they react by escaping to suburbs, not by improving the city.
I don't know what the laws should be exactly, but I know it can be done, because Czechs and Germans did it much better than we.
Even if you don't believe they're all psychopaths, even normal people act according to incentives, and no one does anything without some sort of (perceived) benefit to themselves.
So when an official is deciding how to use other people's money, he will be trying to gain personally from his position, and that's where bribes come in.
But yes, in reality, they're pretty much all psychopaths, and they get themselves into positions of power because 1) that's what they crave (as psychos), and 2) they get to use their political power for their personal gain.
Look at what they do, look at the way politicians and officials have behaved everywhere since forever, and.. you'll have to accept that I'm right.
> There is a problem with esthethic. I think I was clear about that.
But you can't legally mandate good taste because most people just don't have it, and the same problems apply everywhere. So what's the real problem and how do you think laws would solve it?
> And people don't like to live in houses that can fall apart, or that are badly insulated
Do people want to look at buildings that are clearly just plain ugly? Do they want chaos and mayhem?
Of course not. So if you think quality is fine because people want quality, why wouldn't the other stuff be fine too if it's guided by what people want?
I really don't think people in local government are any worse or better than people working in X, for any X. If you think otherways - your choice, but would be nice if you show some proofs.
As a programmer you are making decisions how to use others people money (your code will, and you decide what it does). As an architect you decide how to use others people money. Same for lawyer, banker, insurance agent, business analyst, contractor, ... This is true for most white-collar jobs.
I don't see how you can think local administration clerks are worse and we are better. It's intelectually lazy.
In the worst case - local administration comes from people, and are choosen by people. They are on average only as corrupted, as average citizen.
> Do people want to look at buildings that are clearly just plain ugly? Do they want chaos and mayhem?
Yes. Apparently they don't care. As long as they get paid for that billboard, and it's legal - they are blind. Look at this:
http://grafik.rp.pl/g4a/905243,471826,9.jpg
http://static.wirtualnemedia.pl/media/images/2013/images/szy...
http://www.poranny.pl/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=KP&Date=2007...
http://ekoszalin.pl/sds/2013/06/11/51b71d299cc20.jpg
http://bi.gazeta.pl/im/b2/da/d4/z13949618Q,Reklamowy-chaos-w...
Tell me with a straight face it's not out of control.
This is how my country loooks like now. It can be solved, because I've seen it solved in countries like Germany, Czech Republic (and to lesser degree even Lithuania or Slovakia). It's simple - you restrict billboards and advertisments in the city. No need for definition of "bad taste" in law.
Then there's simple bad planning (or no planning). This is most true in new suburban districts. Typical image: http://m.ocdn.eu/_m/45a8af04428ecb9e04a332883176027c,29,1.jp...
Randomly choosen plots, random road network build after the fact so that everybody has some way to drive to their house, no matter in how contrived way. Costs for building infrastructure much higher than if someone spend a month thinking beforehand. Again - chaos. And it can be easily solved with proper urban planning. It's not rocket science.
As for bad taste - this is harder problem, but it can also be solved. Just to show what we are speaking about:
http://www.malak.com.pl/termomodernizacja/elewacje-rozane3.j...
http://www.malak.com.pl/termomodernizacja/elewacje-teczowe2....
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/8974/1118221.jpg
http://naszglospoznanski.pl/wp-content/uploads/przedszkole_f...
This is understandable reaction to 50 years of gray communism, but still. At least the next generation will fix this with some paint.
