I get it. I see the huge benefits in a ground-up design for Erlang in the JVM. (Said design should definitely use existing GC, scheduler, etc.).

However, while what you are describing is technically the JVM, it's sort of a Ship of Theseus (with the GC replaced, with static binary manipulation by Quasar, etc.). This isn't a bad thing, but it's not what I'd normally associate with the JVM and its ecosystem.

I've got a bit of a "chip on my shoulder" regarding what I see as a pretty terrible experience with Akka. I feel strongly that preemption makes a huge difference in usability. With Akka, there are too many caveats relating to things you can and cannot do. Rather than simplifying my life, Akka gives me a whole bunch of additional ways I can break my application. While it could be said that "being a professional engineer" means solidly understanding my tools, I don't feel that is a scalable way to build development teams.

I'd love an out-of-the-box "erlang mode" switch (or some sort of launcher) that would give me these safe behaviors. Something along the lines of Percona for MySQL.

Reach out to me directly with email (in profile). This has been a fascinating discussion and I'm very interested in learning more.