Lessons from Both Sides of an Interview Desk (opens in new tab)

Small rant:

your chances of getting a response from any single application are slim.

Every company beyond a certain size is using some kind of ERP to keep track of applicants, and even the smaller ones use something like Outlook or a similar calendaring app to keep track of people they've interviewed.

Is it really asking so much to get a "We decided not to hire you at this time" email? Without that, you don't know if they decided to skip you, or if you're still in process because the company's hiring process moves at a glacial pace.

The sheer amount of deception and silly dance nonsense required to get hired is insane.

On the suit front the thing I always bear in mind is that it is always easier to dress down than it is to dress up. Removing a tie or a jacket is much easier to do, and an easy way to start a discussion about company culture. Much better than belatedly realising the developers may wear jeans but this interview process also involves HR people or senior types. Unless the company is the sort of faddish place which makes it clear that they never wear smart clothes I would personally always suit up.

"Business casual" especially is a social minefield. That said I don't mind wearing a suit to work, if you're vehemently pro-casual clothes then you might want to go the other way and make a point of it. That said I've yet to be convinced that in tech there is a time you won't need to dress smartly, even Zuck wore a suit recently...

> Also, if you have to bend their skills and experience in different ways for different jobs, you're probably applying for positions that you're a marginal fit for, instead of waiting for finding a job that you're a better, obvious fit for on the basis of your generic, undoctored resume.

Or you have a title, like "systems engineer", that means different things to different industries and causes confusion.

Or you deviated from your original path for personal reasons and need to explain why you are trying to get back on it.

Or you have had roles that do not easily translate to the specific domains of the companies you are applying to.

Or you have roles where your ability to provide clear, detailed information about your contributions is limited by law or legal agreements.

Yes, all of the above apply to me. I don't think I'm very unique in this regard.

I very strongly disagree with not customizing your resume/cover letter. As a programmer it is not very difficult to have a template that you can slightly alter and, if required, throw a script together to insert pertinent details. As for applying for job that you are a poor fit for I disagree - you would also need to highlight different parts of what you have done if you are a bit more of a generalist.

These two pieces of advice never really applied to software developers.

They still absolutely apply if you're looking for a job on the business side.

Being able to send files in an appropriate format is a communication skill, a basic skill for any employment, and .docx is almost never appropriate.

You're going to be dinged for a Word doc by some people, some of the time. You created a % chance that your job application got thrown away for something easily remedied. At least take one second to convert to a more generally-viewable PDF.

Besides which, the article is talking about code. Why would anyone cut and paste code into a Word doc at all? A waste of time for everyone involved.

I know he wasn't referring specifically to CVs and resumes, but one problem with using .docx for those is that it won't look the same on all computers. For example, if you format something in Word on Windows, it may look slightly different when pulled up on a mac or vice versa. So you spend 30 minutes getting your resume to fit on one page, only for someone to open up your Word file on the other OS and the resume spills over by one line onto the next page. PDF is much safer to use if you need to make sure that it looks the same no matter who is opening the file.

Regardless of how petty you think it is, friction is a real concern.

Any reason to disregard a resume ("Oh, it's hard open, in some format I don't understand") is just another strike against you.

I'm not saying it's a great reason. Nor is it fair. But it happens. And if you're trying to optimize for success, this is one of the parameters.

Give your resume in PS format and see how far that gets you.

The article has problems, but that isn't one of them.

He isn't talking about a resume being sent as a docx file, he's talking about a coding example being sent as a docx file with bad formatting.

1-2 weeks? I don't believe it. Maybe in SV, where young developers are constantly being kidnapped off the street and forced at gunpoint to code for $200k+ and free lattes in swanky offices with foosball tables (or so I've been led to believe).

My shortest job hunt took about a month, but I was a cheap junior dev then. These days, I'm constantly getting pinged by recruiters, but I know better than to take that as evidence that finding a new job would be easy.

My last job hunt took almost 6 months (ok, I was being a bit selective). Hell, finding someone that didn't balk when I told them my current salary (and I was looking for a job in a fairly low COL area) took at least a month (and I'm too old to care about foosball tables and free lattes).

And now my current job has been eroding pay/benefits and layering on useless processes and other BS. I can feel that itch coming on... better budget a year to be safe.

General job market advice is to budget (financially) 6 months to find another job.

If you work in a high-demand sector, if you are experienced, if you're not bothered by the ethics of who you work for or about the conditions, and you are lucky, it might take you less time. Good. You saved yourself some budgeted time and you should be happy about this.

There are plenty of jobs where you won't even get through the door in 1-2 weeks. Many companies have hiring cycles that don't allow that level of flexibility.

I've found new job in one day two years ago, but year ago it took me over 2 months. Luck is also big factor.

I mean, that damn near fits the bill for me last year when I left my first job and was looking for a mid level position. 3 years professional experience, had been doing some limited freelancing/consulting in that time, and for a couple years before that. Even have a blog post where I log pain-in-the-ass problems and the solutions to them. Titles are a giant fog since every company has their own system, but I view Junior X as someone with no experience beyond maybe an internship, but your mileage will vary. That's how it's been at the places I interviewed/talked to back then, and right now. Having 3 years good experience puts you on the bottom rung of middle tier.