https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&e...
> "Is abortion okay", returns an excerpt from a strongly pro-life viewpoint
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&e...
> "Does God exist", returns an atheist's viewpoint
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&e...
> "Is God real", returns a strongly theistic viewpoint
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&e...
I feel like Google isn't doing a good service by providing quick and very biased answers to very big questions.
Probably not. But I think the alternative -- Google choosing what it (or rather, an internal committee) thinks is the best answer and providing it -- may even be worse, depending on the topic and your personal opinions.
If Google were the United States government, we'd probably be having fits over such a possibility. Heck, people (rightly) have had fits over such instances. I have equal distaste over a large multinational corporation doing the same.
However, when asking actual questions about physical things like fixing cars, resetting mac OSX images, and keeping meat in the fridge for more than 5 days - it works great! I love it!
Men who have contributed absolulely nothing to the advancement of society, culture, science, medicine, engineering or any of the real things that improve the human condition.
These people truly need to be laughed at and ridiculed. From the Pope all the way down the hierarchy and similarly for all religions.
Think about what these people do and contribute every day versus what teachers, scientists, doctors, engineers, construction workers and business people contribute. There is zero comparison.
It's 2015. Ridicule them. Don't apease or respect them. And please, oh, please, do not give them the respect of having equal standing to scientific theories on the internet. A search for anything creationist should only deliver solid explanations of how utterly ridiculous it is to even begin to consider any part of the entire contrived framework.
How much longer are we going to tolerate the men with funny hats piss all over centuries of accumulated and massively tested scientific knowledge? 100 years? 200? 500? Why?
Mocking people does nothing to change their opinion. I'm trying to change your opinion with this post. Would I be more sucessful if I called you names?
I totally sympathise - I hate the fact that so many people believe absolute nonsense. But then I know plenty of atheists who also believe absolute nonsense.
With regards to ridiculing them. Tolerance is a delicate thing.
What if you had a million people still believing and promoting the "fact" that blood-letting and human sacrifice were necessary in order to cure disease and promote good crops? And what if they pointed to a set of words chiseled out on some stones as being the command from their god to engage in human sacrifice? And they demanded legal protection from our government? And, of course, tax exemption? And, of course, to be able to teach this to your kids and my kids in school? And every politician had to swear that they believed in this horse-shit because they need those million votes?
What do you do then? Do you embrace and tolerate them? Or to you fight them at every corner, even ridicule them, in order to eradicate their influence form society?
Should a politician who says her or she believes in this shit be allowed to hold office? Should a President swear on the chiseled tablets as a sign of entering into a covenant with the people? Should a whole nation proclaim to be under the protection of these gods who want human sacrifice?
No, of course not. And if you tolerate them. If we accept them. If we allow them to even for a microsecond sit at the same table with scientists we fail to evolve as humans.
You have to laugh at them in order to shift them into an uncomfortable position where they'll have to really question what they are saying. Why don't we, as adults, say we believe in the Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus? Nobody has proven they don't exist? In fact, you can't prove they don't exist. Yet anyone would be laughed out of a room if they proclaimed these kinds of beliefs. And that would be the right reaction.
No, this is nonsense. It isn't the 1,500's any more. A creationist and their horse-shit have no place anywhere near scientific facts, schools and certainly nowhere related to an online search of the Theory of Evolution. To allow such a thing is a disservice to humanity.
This needs to stop. Let's stop pretending it is OK to believe in flying horsemen, talking snakes, singing bushes, parting seas, getting help from a god on a test while on the other side of town a little kid is dead from cancer, etc., etc., etc.
I am not a militant atheist but I am really getting tired of the bullshit. The constant barrage of nonsense being placed on a level plane with science isn't sitting well with me. None of this nonsense deserves any respect at all. None of it. They get rich of the poor and our governments give them special standing. That's irrational. Absolutely irrational.
Nearly everyone on this planet today owes their lives to science. Yet we don't ridicule morons in funny hats who believe in singing bushes and supernatural beings.
Here's the problem: Politicians like to talk about economic disparity. They do not talk about the real long term problem of intellectual disparity. Fast forward to 100 years from now. If things don't change we will have a situation where there will be a huge gap between those educated in the sciences and those left in the dark through supernatural beliefs and the lack of education.
I know ignorant religious people who home-school their kids and teach them such nonsense as the earth being 5,000 years old. They are so far behind already that they might as well be cave men with iPhones. It's sad, really. They live their lives justifying everything that happens through divine intervention and intent. They are absolutely and totally ignorant in the context of modern scientific knowledge and completely closed to learning or considering anything new. For all they know the earth might as well be flat. I can see a future where it won't be rich vs. poor but ignorant religious vs. scientifically literate. This disparity will cause cataclysmic clashes. I mean, just take a look at some of these tribes in the middle east. They ARE cave-men with iPhones.
No, you have to laugh and ridicule them. In 2015 these ideologies do not deserve any respect whatsoever. None.
Harsh? Probably.
I have done this to people BTW. In some cases they've cussed me out and in a some they have engaged me in conversation. No, I am not an ass about it. I simply smile and politely ask something like "You don't really believe that stuff, do you?". Have I convinced anyone? Don't know, but I did make them think. One of my favorite questions is: "Do you really believe in a singing bush?" and it goes from there.
Religious Men with funny hats invented the Scientific Method.
Is there one already? Wolfram Alpha is close, I guess. Wikipedia is not quite what I'm thinking of. Google is working on something, not sure if it's public though. Their search engine.. also not quite what I'm thinking of.
What/where have I missed?
"Wading thru much bollocks trying to research evolution of pigments. I suggest Google introduce a logical "and.not.god_did_it" switch"
Knowing how to properly use Google is useful. The three most useful tools for Google searches are "-", "*", and "site:" in my opinion.
I don't think it is healthy when santorum is red, and I hope we can get that part of the namespace back after the election.
[1] http://web.stanford.edu/class/ee380/Abstracts/150429.html
I'm not even remotely qualified to untangle the issues, but fundamentally it seems the problem is that truth is being mediated by the electronic systems "I feel lucky" rather than critically analyzed. It's similar to the old newspaper mediation of truth, but far more widespread.