> But what if you objection to GPLv2+ is specifically already realized in GPLv3,like, say, the market-differentiated anti-Tivoization rules.
Yeah, if you like tivoisation, you probably don't like the spirit of the GPL at all. Tivoisation is really a loophole that wasn't anticipated in GPLv2. It should not have been allowed by GPLv2, but it simply wasn't anticipated.
> (Also, "similar in spirit" is so vague as to be completely meaningless.)
Vague is how the law is. It has to be vague, and the people who wrote the GPL have a good understanding of how judges interpret vague language. I trust them to have done a good job.
