On top of that, this interpretation is very controversial to say the least. In most interpretations, the role of the 'observer' is left in the middle, as there is no good reason to assume it should be conscious.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann%E2%80%93Wigner_inte...
The whole argument rests on this sentence, which is just pure nonsense. There's nothing about Hilbert spaces that has anything to do with conscious thought; the conclusion is a complete non sequitur. The context of the sentence doesn't add anything to support such a notion, either.
This is just another in a long line of people putting way too much stock in the very unfortunate choice of the word "observation" as used in QM.
So, the universe contains uncomputable physics?
Some aspect of quantum computing is uncomputable (beyond mere exponential slowdown in a classical simulation)?
Edit: those two claims are at least as interesting as anything about consciousness, but much more amenable to further study!
While others may have more credible claims that the brain's operation depends on quantum behavior, my inclination is to be highly skeptical due to the basic nature of biology combined with the bias you cite.
