We're very sympathetic with all the job seekers but right now there are just too few jobs in our database. Eventually we may introduce a special keyword to omit staffing agencies from the search results or something like that.
And thank you for your input too! Good luck with your job search!
I have not noticed this in MA, and companies that do this go to the bottom of my response list. I had the same reaction as the grandparent poster, and something that tries to foist those sorts of things off on me is an immediate "nope, I'll look elsewhere."
http://www.warplife.com/jobs/computer/united-states/oregon/m...
http://www.warplife.com/jobs/computer/united-states/washingt...
http://www.warplife.com/jobs/computer/united-states/californ...
None of them are staffing firms.
And a great catch! The search is not perfect yet. False hits are returned if a city name occurs within a job description itself. For example, you search for Java in San Francisco, other jobs will be returned too if they contain San Francisco.
We're aware of this issue and it's on our top to-do list. Plus we're analyzing searches to make them better but right now there are just to few jobs in our database.
And thank you for your input too, old man!
https://www.staticjobs.com/search.php?query=php+new+york
Cybercoders, Kforce, Randstad - all bottom feeder headhunters.
Actually, that's my #1 want in a job search site - the ability to filter out all ads that don't explicitly include the company name, the real client, not a headhunter.
We're still an early stage start-up and there are just to few jobs in our database.
If you have no jobs, why would the candidates search there?
If you have no candidates, why would anyone post their jobs?
Surprisingly, I only get decent interviews from Craigslist. I tried a couple of others with zero conversion rate.
We're a new job search site for all computer professionals. Please, check us out! We made the website intentionally simple but we're C++ programmers, not designers. Therefore, we would appreciate any feedback, both positive and negative.
YC-funded start-ups and everyone else, if you're looking to post your jobs, please, give us a try. We're giving 25 free jobs to promote our site but if you need more, contact us and tell us you found us on Hacker News. We'll figure out something for you.
Those who need a job or looking for a change, we don't require you to register to submit your resume and never will. Just a few basic fields to fill out and you're done!
Thanks, folks!
The site itself is great, though.
I developed most of the site on my 15.6 inch laptop running Ubuntu. I just loved Ubuntu's Times New Roman and didn't like its Arial. On Windows it's the opposite. Arial looks much better.
Similarly, blue hyperlinks looked great on my laptop's monitor but they're so-so on other monitors.
And you just confirmed both of my thoughts! There's indeed a great contrast between blue hyperlinks and white background on most monitors. And the font is hideous on Windows too, :-(.
We're going to fix both problems soon. As well, we're analyzing job searches to improve them. There's a lot of room for improvement both on the front-end and back-end.
Any idea where i should go to find research jobs? Apart from the crappy Indeed and LinkedIn that is...
Unfortunately, I am trying to move from academia to the private / non-profit sector's 'research associate' etc roles. Finding it to be truly difficult.
Thanks for the reply though!
2 years of experience and 180k?! What do I get for 10? Im in the wrong city I guess
I know that man, though he never placed me. He has jobs in HFT field and financial industry in general.
How true those 180K I don't know.
Right now at least one keyword such as Java needs to be specified in order for the search to return results (assuming there are jobs with those keywords). Adding a location (you can have multiple cities and/or states) narrows your search down to jobs in those cities or states.
We may change the logic to return all the jobs if only a location is specified. This seems to be the confusing part. (We're analyzing job searches to improve them.)
Thanks for your feedback!
One problem the current job search sites have that you might be interested in tackling, is that they lack a way of objectively measuring the capabilities of the applicants.
There are software engineers that are 100x as productive as some others, but the pay for all of us is always within a factor of 3 or 4. If you can solve that problem, employers will love you for helping them hire better engineers, and qualified applicants will love you for getting them higher-paying jobs.
My partner has exactly the same thoughts. The market is indeed extremely saturated and there's huge money in it. However, I haven't seen good websites (in my opinion, that is) without all that clutter and visual noise.
Our focus is more on simplicity and we don't want you to spend hours on our site. Instead, we want you to quickly find a job, send your resume and move on. When you need a job, of course.
We too discussed the problem you suggested. That, however, imposes an additional burden on job seekers. Think about it. Interviews used to be 50 minutes long with one interviewer. Now we have phone screens in addition to face-to-face interviews, tests, job seekers have to fill out forms with hundreds of fields, meet with a bunch of interviewers, post JSON objects to URLs and other "clever" things.
This is not normal and we want to change that. I wonder if anyone else has given a thought to the whole situation.
Anyway, it's not our final decision and right now we just don't have the capacity for all extra stuff.