NES graphics – Part 1 (opens in new tab)

> it encompasses the technical and the artistic domains

these days, the amount of knowledge required in those two domains are such that no one person can be an expert in both ( at least,for a non-genius!). Think about 3D artists, and think about people who write the pipeline and tools etc for them - one does not know anything about the other really. I wish there's a way to simplify it all so that modern games can be made just as "simple" and intuitive as the old 2D bitmapped graphics.

Funny thing about the NES palette is it's actually spectacularly poorly chosen. It has no yellow and dedicates 10 entries to black.

Source: http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Games/Hacking/Wiki/index.php?...

The color limitations of the NES made it look so dated so quickly. The resolution isn't much lower than the SNES but there are so few colors available compared to the 32,768 colors of the SNES.

This webpage:

https://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/email-a-look-i...

shows Nintendo programmers plugging away at HP 64000 which was likely corporate-owned and long destroyed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_64000

Japanese developers from that era are famously secretive. I have heard that Nintendo has a reputation for being particularly shortcoming with information to journalists or historians.

eeeh NDA will probably prohibits, hence lost

This is the ol' chunky (all of the bits for a pixel stored adjacently in memory) vs. planar (image broken up into separate "bitplanes") graphics debate. Planar was very common for early 2D hardware, as it was the natural extension of 1-bit monochrome display hardware, which would load a byte at a time into a shift register, shifting a bit out per pixel clock. Instead of needing to redesign the hardware around a larger shift register, you could just duplicate your existing shift register, shift them out in parallel, and combine the results with some simple logic.

It had a variety of benefits for simple 2D composition. For instance, it allowed for flexible bit depths in video modes. The Amiga (IIRC) allowed you to set up video modes with anywhere from 1 to 5 bits per pixel, while the SNES allowed 2, 4, and 8 bits per pixel formats; lower depth modes would simply load the unused shift registers with 0s, and everything would work the same. With chunky pixel hardware, this would have been unfeasible at the time, as the pixel format packing would change too much between bit depths. It was a handy feature to have, so that, say, text in an RPG could be placed on a monochrome layer that would not take up as much video memory, while the rest of the game could be rendered in full color.

The NES doesn't support flexible bit depths, but a similar principle allows a simple kind of "compression" when storing compressed graphics data in ROM: for a monochrome font, you wouldn't need to store the upper bitplane, and you'd just zero it out when loading the font. For chunky hardware, this process would be a bit more involved than that (no pun intended).

Of course, once you advance beyond simple 2D composition to software rasterization, the planar format becomes a liability. Rotating and scaling a bitmap, for instance, would involve making multiple unpredictable read-modify-write memory accesses per pixel, instead of just directly overwriting a pixel at a time.

Here are some links that discuss some of the other tradeoffs of the two formats, like how you can use planar formats to implement simple alpha blending effects for shadows and the like:

http://oldwww.nvg.ntnu.no/amiga/amigafaq/AmigaFAQ_16.html

http://www.sega-16.com/forum/showthread.php?9265-For-the-Tec...

Definitely second writing your own as a way to learn. I wrote one that could mostly play pong a while back and it was super satisfying. The PPU was definitely the toughest part.