Periscope "clicked" for me when I saw how he used it: basically doing live TV news broadcasts from crime scenes. Wow. Very, very cool. But about 2 minutes into watching his first one, next click for me: comments on this thing should be disabled by default.
You want to see harassment, look at racist bullshit hitting the screen as a reporter documents a south side murder scene.
Periscope can't possibly keep this default. You have to assume they're going to get around to fixing it.
The guy handled it well but it was clear that some of the viewers were trying to goad him.
There would be three easy solutions:
1) allow broadcasters to turn off comments entirely (only allowing hearts)
2) allow broadcasters to make comments visible only to themselves, to reduce the incentive of griefers by shrinking the audience.
3) making all periscope comments into actual tweets.
5) Support shared blocklists
Of the people I follow on Twitter, a surprising number of fairly mainstream journalists are finding themselves blocked by people they have never interacted with.
People in the "public eye" invariably draw positive and negative attention. Does what amounts to narcissism need to be further coddled by essentially automatically filtering out negativity?
I understand that the tool could do with some work for private/family/friend only streaming or similar, but if you're going to put yourself out into the public forefront you should be able to take the good with the bad.
Cyberbullying is rampant, it's a big issue, but it's not a technology issue. The issue is with the people using it. For every kid that's experiencing cyberbullying there's another kid on the opposite end bullying them online. Let's stop trying to push responsibility onto the platform provider and instead focus on the people involved.
When I get annoyed at this kind of stuff one of my best friends always tell me "don't be a little bitch"... And it's true, since the very beginning of the internet as we know it there has always been harassment, the only opinion about yourself that matters is yours.
And really if you get annoyed at this, you can always choose not to use this software. Same way you choose not to go to /b/. Don't be entitled to make the software work for you, and likely Twitter makes more money from trolls than from whiners.
I don't know if it's a culture thing but you guys (mostly west coast people) have a very thin skin and just take yourself way too seriously.
Guess what? I found all the comments funny and entertaining.
has it happened yet to chatroulette? or this time this app is different?
"When you hop into Periscope, you see streams from all around the world. From an engagement perspective, this is fantastic."
right next to
"There where only about 12 viewers of this stream, meaning a quarter of users watching were there to do harm."
On what planet of 6 billion people, is having two-billionths of the population tune in where most of them are weirdos be fantastic engagement?
If (when?) that app dies, assuming you can anthropomorphize something with that little traction "alive", two billionths of the world population are going to be really sad. The trolls will likely move on to pester the non-app users, so us 5999999986 unimportant people are going to have to put up with trolling where we hang out. Oh well.
I can imagine lasting societal value to an app that acts as little more than a honeypot for trolls.
Perhaps the point was people from all over the world are using it rather than the product being popular only in a single region of the world?
I'd say your logic is more misguided then mystifying.
(P.S. - The world population is closer to 7 billion)
