undefined | Better HN

0 pointsworklogin11y ago0 comments

So a state-of-the-art graphics library, a critical component to your new, moderately successful video game, doesn't deserve 5% of the revenue?

0 comments

cwyers11y ago

Yeah, if you think you can write your own alternative to Unreal Engine for less than (revenue-$3000)*0.05 per quarter, then by all means, you should do that.

Retric11y ago

Competion is a wonderful thing.

I can't build a decent car for less than the cost of a low end BMW. But, there are plenty of other companies than can.

So, the real question is what are the other options out there and I suspect there are few engines that can come close.

cwyers11y ago

iDTech is no longer licensed for third-party use; only Zenimax properties can use it. CryEngine is available -- they have a $10 a month subscription plan that is royaly-free, but you don't get source code access like you do with Unreal Engine here. (They offer seperate terms for source access.[1]) Unity exists, but I don't think it's in quite the same tier as Unreal (although for some projects that may not matter).

[1] http://cryengine.com/get-cryengine

Arelius11y ago

Perhaps not, as a graphics programmer, rewriting the rendering system is comparatively simple, enjoyable, and perhaps not worth 5% of a moderately successful game.

However, UE4 is much more than just a graphics library. I'd argue that it's editor alone is worth many times more than their rendering features. And IMO, it's trivially worth the 5% of revenue.

darkmighty11y ago

Writing a rendering system or this rendering system? I think you're underestimating the tech here. Could you match their real time global illumination, radiosity, physically based rendering, etc with good performance? I get the impression you'd need to go over like 100 different papers to even get a baseline implementation, without any clever optimizations, for a modern engine like UE4.

daemin11y ago

Yeah, any reasonably skilled programmer can write a pretty graphics engine as a hobby project, since that is the fun part of making an engine. It's all of the other boring stuff that is worth (arguably) more than 5%. Writing the resource management system and the editors takes a long time and a lot more effort and is not as fun or glamorous as writing a rendering engine.

SSLy11y ago

Not to mention this is much more than a 3D rendering middleware.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

cwyers11y ago

Yeah, if you think you can write your own alternative to Unreal Engine for less than (revenue-$3000)*0.05 per quarter, then by all means, you should do that.

Retric11y ago

Competion is a wonderful thing.

I can't build a decent car for less than the cost of a low end BMW. But, there are plenty of other companies than can.

So, the real question is what are the other options out there and I suspect there are few engines that can come close.

cwyers11y ago

[1] http://cryengine.com/get-cryengine

Arelius11y ago

Perhaps not, as a graphics programmer, rewriting the rendering system is comparatively simple, enjoyable, and perhaps not worth 5% of a moderately successful game.

However, UE4 is much more than just a graphics library. I'd argue that it's editor alone is worth many times more than their rendering features. And IMO, it's trivially worth the 5% of revenue.

darkmighty11y ago

daemin11y ago

SSLy11y ago

Not to mention this is much more than a 3D rendering middleware.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse