undefined | Better HN

0 pointsavsm11y ago0 comments

I can't really usefully answer that question without knowing more about what your purpose is.

If your purpose is to learn how to program in a functional style, then either language is fine. Other than that, the main difference between the two is purity/effects, lazy/strict, and type-classes/modules in Haskell and OCaml. That all changes the specifics of the code being written quite dramatically.

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

pekk11y ago· 1 in thread

I was asking about the exact uses murbard2 detailed, for which murbard2 thought OCaml was not ideal... not asking which language I should learn to understand functional programming

mercurial11y ago

Your question was phrased incorrectly, though.

Anyway, I'm not sure what murbard2 is objecting to. The only thing I got is "Functional programming languages shine when they deal with complex, recursive data structures, not for simple tasks which are primarily IO and need to handle many cases."

Well, OCaml-the-language does IO perfectly fine (even if you want to augment/replace the standard library, which admittedly does few things "perfectly fine"), and languages with algebraic datatypes are very good at handling "many cases" in a typesafe way.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse