undefined | Better HN

0 pointstsotha11y ago0 comments

>... no one should be publishing someone else's content under their name without their continued consent.

I disagree. That's the deal when you add content to one of these kinds of sites - you don't own it. And you know that going in. And there are valid reasons to disallow it: if people start deleting their own answers the conversation becomes (in some cases) impossible to follow.

It's kind of silly to be so heavily invested on a site like this and then expect them to change the rules when you're ready to move on.

0 comments

knorby11y ago

But StackOverflow sites allows deletion, at least in part, as the author points out. So it is fair to say they aren't really enforcing that notion either.

I don't think I'm necessarily hinting at a copyright issue, though I think some control over attribution is pretty fundamental to it, but the point I'm trying to make is that the right of attribution is a stronger one than SO's right to maintain high-quality content. There are a number of ways that right can be accommodated, and it is the job of the publisher to figure out how.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointstsotha11y ago0 comments

>... no one should be publishing someone else's content under their name without their continued consent.

It's kind of silly to be so heavily invested on a site like this and then expect them to change the rules when you're ready to move on.

0 comments

knorby11y ago

But StackOverflow sites allows deletion, at least in part, as the author points out. So it is fair to say they aren't really enforcing that notion either.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse