undefined | Better HN

0 pointsperlgeek11y ago0 comments

> What are the advantages of MoarVM over Parrot

Mostly that MoarVM developers could learn from all of Parrot's successes and mistakes, while not carrying any of the historical baggage. That means cleaner design, less memory footprint, faster execution.

> and why were we stuck at Parrot for so long before giving it up?

Rakudo works on Parrot. Why drop support for it?

Once you frame the question that way, the answer becomes obvious: because there hasn't been big changes to the code generation yet that would make continued parrot support painful. Once we reach that point, the situation will be reconsidered.

0 comments

chromatic11y ago

Mostly that MoarVM developers could learn from all of Parrot's successes and mistakes, while not carrying any of the historical baggage.

I think you're being uncharitable. It's clear enough in retrospect that plenty of Rakudo developers wanted to get rid of Parrot years ago, but wanted to couch their "Let's burn it all down and start over" in much more careful terms which allowed them to take advantage of Parrot's stability when marketing P6 to the outside world while using Parrot's concomitant lack of development to prove that they'd made the right choice.

perlgeekOP11y ago

> I think you're being uncharitable. It's clear enough in retrospect that plenty of Rakudo developers wanted to get rid of Parrot years ago

I think you are being uncharitable. It's clear now as it has always been to me that the Rakudo developers wanted a working, fast VM that provides the needed features. Since Parrot couldn't deliver this, it was just naturally to look for alternatives.

Also, it makes me sad that you argue a lot about Rakudo's and Parrot's past, but seem to neglect their current state or the future. Could it be that you care more about how Parrot will be remembered, then about how it does today?

kbenson11y ago

That's... an odd way to start a response in which you are very obviously being uncharitable yourself in assessing the motivations and actions of real people. What's more, you are doing it as a non sequitur.

I'm really not sure what you're trying to say here. How is a later project being able to look at what came before and try to determine what decisions were good and bad of the prior project and trying to avoid them being uncharitable, and what does that have to do with whether some people wanted something different long ago?

chromatic11y ago

After the first Rakudo Star release, I personally volunteered to spend my Parrot time fixing bugs which affected Rakudo, improving the performance of Rakudo, and adding features for Rakudo, in that order. I offered several suggestions (including native registers, better profiling, object system improvements) and was repeatedly told not to work on them. I will say this, though: there was no friction to working on the profiling system (though it went unused). This happened to other people as well.

I've documented this at length elsewhere.

Those specific features we were told explicitly not to work on were on the top of the list of "Reasons Rakudo Must Abandon Parrot". I find that disingenuous, as if Parrot had been set up for failure.

Perhaps I should apply Hanlon's Razor here, but that feels even less charitable.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsperlgeek11y ago0 comments

> What are the advantages of MoarVM over Parrot

> and why were we stuck at Parrot for so long before giving it up?

Rakudo works on Parrot. Why drop support for it?

0 comments

chromatic11y ago

Mostly that MoarVM developers could learn from all of Parrot's successes and mistakes, while not carrying any of the historical baggage.

perlgeekOP11y ago

> I think you're being uncharitable. It's clear enough in retrospect that plenty of Rakudo developers wanted to get rid of Parrot years ago

kbenson11y ago

chromatic11y ago

I've documented this at length elsewhere.

Those specific features we were told explicitly not to work on were on the top of the list of "Reasons Rakudo Must Abandon Parrot". I find that disingenuous, as if Parrot had been set up for failure.

Perhaps I should apply Hanlon's Razor here, but that feels even less charitable.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse