He left the office every day at 6:30 sharp and, like clockwork, would answer emails and code reviews starting at 10. Eventually we learned to time our emails and code reviews according to this clock.
The consistency of the timing was remarkable; our favorite theory was that was his kid's bedtime. I guess in effect, he was putting two sets of kids to bed each night :).
Given that Matt did get tenure he clearly is really good at such managerial roles, and probably couldn't help but step up. I bet Google leadership try very hard to get people to do management--it's not easy, on the contrary engineers don't like it and it's a fight to get the good ones to step up. I would bet too that the managerial type things at Google are a lot more fun than the academic ones.
Oh thank god. Not about bitcoin specifically but it feels the whole world has managed to find the time to do a course on FRP, brush up on SEO, configure a Hadoop cluster, grok Haskell monads and still work out what a Mocachino is.
Glad to know mortals still exist.
After an evening of chasing kids around the house to get them to eat, wash and sleep, email does feel like freedom. Especially if you like your job. Also, not all email is alike. Usually no one expects you to answer important email in the evening, so you can quietly catch up on stuff you decided to leave out during the day, some mailing lists, etc. It's kinda like reading HN, just more productive.
I find myself using the evenings to catch up on email, because I can take my time and do it in between other things. I'm sure once family life becomes more prevelant I'll change my tune.
All in all, it is very relaxing compared to my last job. I was full time remote, and probably worked 80 hours a week. I have a much better work/life balance now, as I generally leave my work at the office.
Not all that 9.5 hours on campus is working time. I generally take a break for breakfast & lunch, hit the gym a few times a week, and try to spend an hour or two a week on fun, non work related things (like author talks).
People really have totally different preferences. It's more striking when laid out like that.
I loved the emphasis on family and balance. Timely article for me, I guess.
As far as "wasting education" is concerned, I've blogged extensively about the differences between doing applied research in industry and doing that kind of work in academia or in a more pure research setting, see for example http://matt-welsh.blogspot.com/2010/11/why-im-leaving-harvar...
I find that applying my skills as a systems and networking researcher in an industry setting, where I have the chance to develop and launch real products, is far more satisfying than just writing academic papers. But this is of course not for everyone.
I work for an "extremely" progressive company in the valley, and I have three whole weeks of paid vacation per year, and I'm chafing at that, because I'm used to having six weeks of paid vacation per year.
I will never understand the american work ethic.
I almost never work longer than that. (I honestly wish I could sometimes. I end up having to interrupt myself in the middle of things to leave on time, but such is life when you have kids.)
If he's also doing a bit of email in the evenings, leaving at 4:00 doesn't seem unreasonable. I've never seen or heard anyone fret about work hours at the office. My experience has been that the company is very results oriented.
(This is still hard for me to adjust to coming from EA where I worked a lot of hours and company culture, unintentionally or not, placed a lot of emphasis on how long you kept your seat warm.)
But why? You won't produce more, you won't earn more, you won't learn more?
My role was also one that was pretty amenable to sprints of intensive working followed by periods of rest. I did a bunch of prototyping and working on high-profile, tight-deadline projects, and there was naturally a bunch of downtime in between them.
I've always wondered how google manages this process.
It's interesting to hear this - can you expand?
Probably 2-3 days a week I put in an hour (or two, rarely 3) after the kids are in bed.
I don't always go in "that early" (normal people would slap me if i didn't put that in quotes), but i'm completely responsive on email/IM/etc by about 8:30.
The main difference from Matt is that when I drive (i bring my dog in, and it's not safe to bike with her on shoreline), if I don't get in before 9, IMHO, it's essentially not worth driving in until ~10am.
You'll just waste the time sitting on shoreline.
Biking, yeah, it's always 10 minute for me.
It's difficult to work with folks with 'unconventional' schedules if they are involved in cross-functional or managerial stuff. Fine if you're an individual contributor, but if you need to get a few folks in a room together frequently (project leads, etc) and their working hours have zero overlap, someone's going to get grumpy. I appreciate flexibility in schedule, don't get me wrong, but I also appreciate a bit of self-awareness :)
Matt, your schedule looks so much better than mine! :-)
You'll note that there's approximately zero 'goofing off' time in his schedule, he's either working productively, or not present at work. This is a good way to be productive and maintain sanity.