https://web.archive.org/web/20141013114803/http://cpudb.stan...
I've seen this happening several times after submission to HN.
The plots shown in his presentation basically show off the underlying data in cpudb.
ISSCCx ISSCC Previews - Circuit and System Insights (https://courses.edx.org/courses/IEEEx/ISSCCx/3T2014/info)
Failed to connect to cpudb.stanford.edu port 80: Connection refusedhttp://web.archive.org/web/20141013114803/http://cpudb.stanf...
----
Edit:
I don't know why this is at the top. I see now that couple of other people cited the archive in comments that are now 6 hours old:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8693001
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8693004
(So send them the karma...)
A few interesting charts showing the evolution of CPUs:
* Transistor size (http://cpudb.stanford.edu/visualize/technology_scaling): the process is still regularly scaling down
* Clock frequency (http://cpudb.stanford.edu/visualize/clock_frequency): processors do not tick significantly faster than 4GHz, a speed they reached in 2004/2005
* Performance (http://cpudb.stanford.edu/visualize/performance_by_freq_and_...): I am still unable to display this graph
The clock frequency graph shows a processor at 21.3GHz. It's the Z3480, whose clock actually ticks at 2.13GHz (http://ark.intel.com/products/70102/Intel-Atom-Processor-Z34...).