I own a freelance business and recently contacted an artist to create a logo for me. The artist responded with a contract stipulating that after creating the logo, I would have a non-exclusive license to do what I wanted, but they retain the right to post the image anywhere they keep their portfolio.
Should I be requesting full rights and then agree to license it back to them to display in their portfolio?
I guess I'm not really seeing what is protecting me wrt my logo.
What have others done to protect their rights wrt to their logo?
Normally exclusive and non-exclusive logos or designs are based on the amount you are paying for the work. Normally the more expensive logos are exclusive and in the contract the designer has a license to display the logo as the work they did for you along with a case study or summary of the client.
A non exclusive would not be good for a business as the designer at any time could make small changes and then use that logo for other clients in a template format (You want original work). In which someone else that purchases services from them could them come after you for having a similar logo.
It is all in the wording of the contract that you have to careful with. Normally all work by a contractor is owned in full by those paying for the work unless otherwise stated in black and white. If you need further guidance I recommend talking with a lawyer to insure a proper contract is created that is fair to you and any contractors that you may work with.
It seems like once you start actually doing business with the logo, trademark should do the most important restricting. It may or may not still be a good idea to restrict it further.
