So far I was reluctant to talk to VCs, because I'd lose some control and I'd have to deal with all the stuff I don't want to (incorporating, papers, lawyers, etc.) instead of working on the product. So I came with an idea: since the app's is a _bit_ hot right now and it has to do with finance a bit, I'd look around for a bank which would be willing to pay for the development in exchange for my project helping them strengthen the image of a bank that understands mobile and new technologies. I'd brand the app a little (splashscreen, link to their mobile app in the menu and a few extra sponsored features), I'd mention them whenever I talk to the media. So I contacted a few banks, met with some people and it looks like this thing might happen.
I also spent the last few weeks talking to a bunch of smart people about my project. I figured I might learn from their experience and boy, was I right! I got a ton of good advice (and a lot of praises, which nicely tickled my ego).
The last meeting I had put a lot of question marks in my head, though. I met with Jacob Krzych, CEO of Estimote and an YC alumnus. I got a ton of good advice (thank you, if you happen to read this :-) ), but one thing surprised me, he said it would be a great mistake to do the bank deal. It would be a distraction and I'd have to compromise the UI. I should talk to VCs instead.
Now I'm torn... we're talking about an amount that would let me hire enough people (4-5) for half a year but I have to agree that my app's interface wouldn't be 100% about the user anymore.
What do you think?