We have also talked about the idea of allowing building owners to comment or make a request to prove that issues in a building have been fixed. Though that would be a little ways down the road.
It's weird to me that your usage case on the site is for an individual person, but you only offer monthly subscriptions. In my experience people usually aren't looking for a place for more than 30 to 60 days, so why would I want to buy into a monthly subscription model with usage caps. Kind of annoying to have to sign up then almost immediately cancel.
A smaller developer or investor would probably be more interested in a regular subscription.
Agreed on the pricing. We're still trying to dial that in. I think a single 30 or 90 day access makes sense and then possibly a monthly subscription for real estate agents that want to provide reports to their clients.
Otherwise, this looks cool. I work in the real-estate space, so it's nice to see some innovative ideas coming through. You mentioned in another comment that you use public data but try to be very careful about what goes in. How do you do that? With humans or with automated tools?
Looks fantastic either way. Good luck. I'd like to see what you can come up with in other cities.
In terms of the data collection, currently it's a mix of manual and automated. We're pushing to get is all automated so it'll be easier to maintain and expand.
