I used it with my (fake) EdTEch Startup Generator[1], to check if my fake startup is actually a real startup. I was surprised how often it happens.
[1] http://eduwampus.herokuapp.com *
* May load a little slow, it's on Heroku free tier.
Should mint.com (acquired by Intuit five years ago after raising thirty million in five rounds) or redfin.com (ten years old, and has raised a hundred million dollars in seven rounds) really be considered startups?
There is really no dejure definition of a startup as it is. Not to mention that the site doesn't even give its own definition of what qualifies to be listed on the site.
One thing I thought was interesting as I was clicking around was how so many of the sites have "converged" to a single UI design style, e.g. full screen photo background overlaid with a short blurb about the site, and a big slightly rounded-rectangular "start" button (sometimes some text fields), then as you scroll down you usually get a couple horizontally laid out big icons, etc. etc.
Of course, this isn't surprising, but it just becomes so apparent as you click refresh. Just thought it was interesting, that's all.
In other cases, the default is to not let a page mix origins: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-origin_policy#Cross-Origin...
Scratch that, google docs for submittal :) seriously?! Even graduates from devbootcamp's can do 100 times better and we should give them some slack.
I'd suggest more modern look and feel for the top bar, maybe something like a black bkgd with opacity? Currently it pulls the feel of the site down a bit.
1)The top bar can be improved.
2) Hackerrank constantly refreshes for me. Some sites do not load properly.
3) Lots of startups appear again, if a startup site has been shown can it be removed from the queque?
EDIT: Noticed that you can click the #<number>
