The whole thing says to me that it was a whole lot of work, for not a whole lot of excellence.
Still though, I bet it goes faster than my car.
The whole description seems satisfyingly low tech. The engine is carburetted rather than fuel-injected but it claims a higher power to weight ratio than a Vyron.
It's interesting that this company's nearly hand-made cars cost only three times the cost of a factory made Toyota ("Our cars start at $56,995 for the 427 models and $61,995 for the 289 models"). I would have imagined that the ratio was much more - a hand-made Pentium would set you back a lot more than 3X the cost of a factory built one.
"The smallest run possible is typically 12 wafers, which can cost more than US $50 000 after tallying up the cost of materials, photolithography, and fabrication, he says."
http://www.theinstitute.ieee.org/portal/site/tionline/menuit...;
What I'd like to know is how much this custom made car cost.
...without an engine!
BHP: > 1000 bhp 0 - 60: < 2.5 sec Top Speed: > 253 mph Braking: 249 mph to 0 in < 10 sec 1/4-mile: 10.2 sec
Not a performance car, my ass.
The Vyron was EPA tested so its power rating is for the engine in the car which is much harder.
But I have no idea why they used a carburated engine. That seems too low tech.
That said it would be cool to see some documentation of software products. From concept to wireframes to UI to deployment with "director's commentary" on the code along the way.
The TapTapTap guys teased at this with their "Convert" UI video:
http://www.taptaptap.com/blog/convert-design-evolution/
If nothing else it would be extremely gratifying for team members and useful training tools for new additions.
Why have this thing custom built when you could have a Tesla roadster for substantially less? Probably because he already has two of those I guess. To each his own...