* The Daniels-Dwyer article serves no obvious public good.
* The post-it thing is a huge wtf. No idea why anyone would even care.
* The train thing is embarrassing; again, reporting on this amounts to gossip mongering for cash and serves no public good.
* The Osborne thing seems like a politically-motivated intrusion into the private life of a politician's brother. Again, trash reporting.
So unless you disagree that these all amount to unhelpful gossip mongering (well, except to the wallet of a lazy reporter/news agency), a little less than half of the unbalanced results demonstrate no harm to the public good.
edit: tone clarification. Also, I agree with your last paragraph.
