I'm saying that this is a prerequisite for Arch. It is not supposed to be or marketed as "for non-experts", quite the contrary.

I'm not disagreeing with his point that Arch shouldn't be used in production. I'm disagreeing with his:

1) Expectation that maintenance (of an Arch Linux system) should be hands-free; and

2) Arch breaks inexplicably, almost insinuating that Arch breaks on purpose.

> Is that what you want to hear?

I do not like the "tone" of this line. Pray tell, what are you trying to imply?

Aside: It would be great if downvotes came with explanations.