If some silly project I contributed to 4 years ago pops up first on my Github page, most potential clients and/or employers are not going to make the effort to scroll through pages of projects to find the projects most representative of my current abilities.
On the bright side, this exact phenomenon has led me to go back and clean up a few projects of mine that became unexpectedly popular. Now they have documentation and updates that I probably wouldn't have made otherwise (although their popularity alone also propelled me to make these changes).
First off, I really dislike this practice to begin with.
That said, under this practice, the current approach discourages people from forking others' repositories (I know at least one person who has a separate account just for this, so it doesn't "clutter" his list of repositories).
It also discourages contributing to new projects with fewer stars. Currently, my contribution to Github's linguist (1880 stars) shows up on my 5 "repositories contributed to". If I contribute to my friend's one-off project, it may or may not push that off and I have no way of knowing, since those five aren't even ordered in any way that I can make sense of. (I have experimented with this in the past, and the repository that seems to be bumped when I make a new submission is arbitrary, as far as I can tell).
Now I kinda regret nuking all that work (didn't think to keep backups around), but a better solution for this would prevent anyone from doing similar in the future.
Visit this link after the one above to find a github easter egg :) https://github.com/contact
eg hit https://github.com/mbostock/d3 then https://github.com/contact
Just reads a bit funny in the case of https://github.com/isaacs/github :)
Thanks!
I would also be happy with just being able to create groups on the repositories tab. Nothing fancy, just being able to say: "Hey, these are my old WordPress plugins; these are my esoteric projects etc."
[1] Strangely github.io pages bookmark just fine.
This is why I left bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issue/3054/make-bitbucket-...
I have plenty of ideas for them…
* allow symlinks in the gh-pages branch
* do not `chmod u+x` every text file in zip archives
* actually support `git-archive`
* make rebasing of PRs easier
* look for a contributor's code in a repo
* when looking at a file, have a link showing current PRs editing it
This will do for now: https://github.com/isaacs/github
"What I'm asking wouldn't be hard at all"
:))
Unless you're intimately involved with the project or a guru in similar projects, you've got no idea whether any feature would be hard / simple, time-consuming/interesting.
That's why they should be taking PRs.
I was just bringing up the similarity between your apparent devaluation of the challenges a new feature brings, with my project manager's ability of adding "sure, done by tomorrow" features during demos :D
I find it hard to quickly search Issues tags when they are in no specific order. I would settle for letting me drag them in an order I want rather than order they were created.
How about just showing my repos that I starred at the top? Or if you want to get slightly more complex, a "Feature" button similar to "Star."
Just like they've been grouping projects on their explore pages -- https://github.com/explore -- I would love to see this functionality availble to users to sort repos on their own profile pages as well.
what would be cool would be if each one could create their own views/rankings of anyone's public repo.
The project is pretty old, but I started it with the assumption that maybe dot files (that are OK being in the public domain) shouldn't be on github in the first place.
I never did get github integration working, and the site is very basic, but I would love some opinions on it
Still, couldn't you use the username.github.io to feature your repos? Or at least have a prominent link from a github profile to that page?
Needs to be a sort selected for others to view when they look at my or my organisations' repo list.
but, as a hiring manager, i don't use Github as a measure for competence. i use Github as a measure for involvement in the open source community (competence usually comes incidentally).
having 30 projects with 0 stars does not really do anything for me that a single code sample through email could not. no matter how you categorize them.
Good for him to live with the pride of his ancestors and not changing his last name. Probably why the domain is oddshocks.com instead of his full name; I see it easily ending up on the wrong side of a NSFW-filter.
When I was a little kid, my last name was a problem because of the times I grew up in, but nowadays it only leads to hilarity. Plus it's short and easy to spell. ;)