undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdoktrin12y ago0 comments

> If raytraced scenes were hard to control, why would every single animated movie be raytraced?

That's a bit of a stretch. Pixar didn't use ray-tracing until Cars [2006]. Even then, it was only applied for secondary effects.

It wasn't until Monsters University [2013] that they produced the majority of a movie using ray-tracing [1]. That's a recent development, IMHO.

[1] http://thisanimatedlife.blogspot.com/2013/05/pixars-chris-ho...

0 comments

1stop12y ago

But that is because of hardware capability... i.e. computers weren't good enough for artists to work with... wasn't it?

I've been out of the 3D world for a while, but Ray tracing was the be-all-end-all/holy grail of 3d. It is simulating light... you can't do better than physics.

chacham1512y ago

Raytracing has its limitations, subsurface scattering for example.

stcredzero12y ago

But don't those go away with enough compute resources?

1 more reply

leoc12y ago

Pixar were late holdouts against non-physically-based rendering though, apparently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG4QuTe8aUw#t=4410

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse