undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgtaylor12y ago0 comments

As a consumer who may consider a Tesla in the future, I like and appreciate this dig. Christie did something underhanded again, let's bring it up to strengthen Tesla's claim that something fishy happened.

0 comments

SilasX12y ago

I can't agree with calling this underhanded on Christie's part. The law, while stupid, actually is the law, not a creation of the governor's or regulator's discretion. See his justification:

"This administration does not find it appropriate to unilaterally change the way cars are sold in New Jersey without legislation and Tesla has been aware of this position since the beginning."[1]

It would be far more underhanded for the governor to exempt a single organization from the rules. Yes, the rules are stupid, but tomorrow it's going to be a time when you do agree with the law, and it amounts to giving a bad guy some special privilege.

[1]http://www.itproportal.com/2014/03/13/new-jersey-bans-the-sa...

gtaylorOP12y ago

>Governor Christie had promised that this would be put to a vote of the elected state legislature, which is the appropriate way to change the law. When it became apparent to the auto dealer lobby that this approach would not succeed, they cut a backroom deal with the Governor to circumvent the legislative process and pass a regulation that is fundamentally contrary to the intent of the law.

How is this not underhanded? It'd be unilaterally preventing the changing of the law since he didn't even allow it to enter the regular legislative process.

He saw it coming and shut it down before it could go through the normal legislative process. Yes, that is underhanded.

SilasX12y ago

I stand corrected. I didn't know that part of the story.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

SilasX12y ago

I can't agree with calling this underhanded on Christie's part. The law, while stupid, actually is the law, not a creation of the governor's or regulator's discretion. See his justification:

"This administration does not find it appropriate to unilaterally change the way cars are sold in New Jersey without legislation and Tesla has been aware of this position since the beginning."[1]

[1]http://www.itproportal.com/2014/03/13/new-jersey-bans-the-sa...

gtaylorOP12y ago

How is this not underhanded? It'd be unilaterally preventing the changing of the law since he didn't even allow it to enter the regular legislative process.

He saw it coming and shut it down before it could go through the normal legislative process. Yes, that is underhanded.

SilasX12y ago

I stand corrected. I didn't know that part of the story.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse