> The fundamental difference between the Mac and other personal computers is that the Macintosh is visually oriented rather than word oriented.
That is the crux of what Apple brought to people with the Macintosh, why they love it, and why I wish it never existed.
But I'd really like to know why you think that it'd be better if Macintosh never existed. Do you think that people would actually be happier with the older ways, and they just don't realize it? Or that most people really are happier, but they should be miserable? Or do you wish that most people didn't use computers at all?
Interestingly this was also a selling point of the Xerox Dandelion series machines that were running Star. And while I believe, as do others, that Steve was influenced by his tour of PARC and seeing this, unlike him I didn't recognize it for what it was.
It seems that their packaging was spot-on even then!
and reading this feels like trying to describe to a fish what walking is:
>"As to the mouse, it is part and parcel of the Mac revolution, and it will probably be the reason you either sign up for or turn your back on this machine. To a large extent, the Macintosh works with what has been termed a ''finder environment.''
YOU find either a word or an icon or pictogram on the screen representing what you want the computer to do, then slide the mouse on your desk to move the cursor into position over that screen object, then press the button on the mouse to activate that particular part of the program."