undefined | Better HN

0 pointstracker112y ago0 comments

Just want to point out one minor nit to pick.. NEVER specify "Arial" or "Helvetica" as fonts and simply fall back to `sans-serif` On OSX you'll get Helvetica, on Windows you'll get Arial, which display better on their given platforms.. a Helvetica-like font is the default on pretty much every given platform for web browsers.

I would say, that if a fallback font is specified in the font-face rule, then that should be used while the web-font is downloaded.

Also, it would be nice, as you say, if a fallback would be used when a glyph isn't in the specified font (only for that glyph).

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

acdha12y ago

You're generally right about `sans-serif` vs. Arial/Helvetica. There used to be a complication in that even on OS X, Arial has significantly more glyphs than Helvetica but as browsers get better font substitution support and stop breaking ligatures (http://chris.improbable.org/experiments/browser/combining-ha...) this matters less.

It would, of course, also be significantly less important if they optimized the download decision so you could use something like noto for everything and not have to worry about significant visual differences.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse