But then again, perhaps the voting system can hold its own well against that.
pg can probably filter based on repeated submissions from the same IP to prevent this type of abuse though.
I guess if the button worked as an upvote/ submit like a digg one it could be useful.
Out of those, HN'ers usually upvote about one out of three to the front page.
Out of those, only about one in ten are really great posts.
I don't mind those odds. Heck, if I could write a great post every time I went to bat I'd be a famous author and not a consultant. I just enjoy writing. But I think there is a bit of self-censorship that goes on at HN with submissions and comments that I don't see elsewhere. I'm perfectly happy with folks submitting everything they write. I just think when we start flooding the net with HN submit buttons we're really stressing out the filtering mechanism past it's design limit. We've already reached the point where you have an hour or less to catch articles on the new tab before they roll off to page two. If folks are going to have to go digging through several pages of new articles everytime they visit it's going to be a turn-off, I'd think. (Although it might grow the site, which means that there is always going to be trade-off between culture and volume around here -- but I digress)
So I'm not crazy about the button. Nice hack, though.