??
Of course they are up to the users to decide, but policies and needs are different. I'm curious, how do you think policies like this change?
Most of the developers i've seen will happily sell you a commercial license if you don't like the software.
After paying for it enough, most companies start to ask "well, actually, how risky is this, really?", and this is how policies change.
In any case, my other point stands - there are no actual legal reasons to not use LGPL/GPL software internally. It would have zero legal impact.