undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjohndcook12y ago0 comments

I like ISO format because then alphabetical order corresponds to chronological order.

Y-M-D and D-M-Y both have their advantages. Unfortunately my compatriots have standardized on M-D-Y, a convention that has no advantages that I can think of.

0 comments

5 comments · 4 top-level

Edvik12y ago· 1 in thread

While not really useful in any computer sense, M-D-Y matches common English spoken construction "January 4th, 2015" is 1-4-15

BerislavLopac12y ago

You mean common American English. The rest of the world is using 4th January, 2015.

vishnumenon12y ago

I've always found M-D-Y apt for many use-cases, because I often know exactly which year is being referred to - I just need to know the month and day. With M-D-Y, that information is immediately presented. It seems like a decent compromise.

chrisdevereux12y ago

For some reason, I'm now thinking about programming for a 'middle-endian' CPU. Maybe it was a compromise between big and small.

adambard12y ago

My favorite format is YYYY-MMM-DD. That is, year, 3-letter (english) month, day (i.e. 2013-Nov-29). Only works for people that know the english names for dates, but eliminates ambiguity about which is the day and which is the month.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse