But years have passed and the validity of the E-Cat is still an open question. There have been some demonstrations, but results are still very much under discussion. There is no undebatable experimental evidence that the device works as advertised. So either Rossi prefers mystery over fame and billions, or the E-Cat a scam in some form or another.
Unfortunately the scientific community is very hesitant to review/reproduce the experiments because the words "cold fusion" have had an extremely bad connotation since the Pons and Fleischmann 1989 fiasco.
I understand that if he actually discovered something that HUGE, he wouldn't want to tell anybody, I know I wouldn't.
But please, don't blame it on "scientific community", that's what conspiracy theorists morons say.
At this point the blame fully lies on the scientific community for ignoring these.
This doesn't mean that DARPA is not a sceptic. It means the unit has passed the simplest test of "not a cardboard box covered in tin foil with a guy going 'Beep Boop' next to it". Now DARPA can buy a single unit and tear it apart to see if there's anything interesting there.
A £1m gamble on interesting is not much for military budgets. I don't think I'd have spent the money - it feels like a scam or a sad delusion - but maybe there's some interesting chemistry even if cold fusion isn't there.
That being said, it definitely seems that they have some sort of energy breakthrough. Whatever fuel they have in the e-cat outputs more energy per density than any conventional fuel source. What is not clear is if this is a battery (like hydrogen) or genuine fuel source. They have been shown to produce a lot of energy over a period of several hours, but I haven't heard of any week or month long tests being conducted.
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-rossi-e-cat-energy-density-high...
His former company Petroldragon was disbanded after they dumped over 70.000 tons of toxic waste (and probably their method of recycling oil didn't work at all).[1 -wikipedia][2- italian source].
Most of the tests that were done violated very basic scientific rules and can be considered demonstration more than anything. The paper on arxiv.org was done by a scientist who was very close to Rossi (Giuseppe Levi) and some of its methods are questionable according to [3 - german] and [4- shorter/incomplete English version].
A real independent proof of the claims made by Rossi is still to be delivered.
While I hope that Andrea Rossi has found the next BIG thing and that he is just paranoid and incredibly bad at communicating, I seriously doubt it and go with "It's a big scam" for now. With some luck history will prove me wrong.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Rossi_%28entrepreneur%29 [2] http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2004/novembre/27/Riciclag... [3] http://www.psiram.com/ge/index.php/Focardi-Rossi-Energiekata... [4] http://www.psiram.com/en/index.php/Focardi-Rossi_Energy-Cata...
EDIT: Typos (at least the worst ones)
PS: If it's enough power to heat a cup of coffee you needed serious shielding.
Note that basically any and all information on ECAT is distributed through a big spam network of SEO sites. I have been following this campaign (along with Steorn) loosely from the very begining.
All the usual telltale signs are there. The project is alway bound to be released in the next 4 months.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Rossi_%28entrepreneur%29...
However, isn't the point of the patent system that the discoveries are made public? Does this mean, since the catalyzer was apparently not patented, that someone could (independently invent and) patent it instead? Or do I understand patents and law in a wrong way?
[1] http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/29/rossi-success
http://news.newenergytimes.net/2012/01/11/rossi-engineering-...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/11/29/why-im-ce...
[0] http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/05/tommaso-dorigo-impressed-b... [1] http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/05/21/the-e-cat...
Household version (released in 4 months, since 2010) is supposed to cost ~2k€. 1MW version purchased by "an unknown customer" (speculated to be acutally DARPA", supposedly costed 1MM$.
> Can't someone buy and review it, test if it works, etc.?
When making a purchase you sign an NDA. So, no.