> In terms of funding science, both of us agree that we need to do more. [...] The US should do more, but relative to others we’ve done more in the basic sciences [...] The US pays more for drugs, and therefore funds more R&D, than any other country.
I'm of mixed minds about anything Bill Gates says. I applaud the fact he's putting 40b+ or whatever it is to charity, but I can't help but think "Did the ends justify the means?" I guess that's my personal opinion of Microsoft's track record. If I'd made X billion, to the point I couldn't possibly spend or splurge any more, I'd give the rest away too. After all, it means nothing at that point.
Is it OK to have huge pharma companies pushing up prices and manipulating prices? Is 'paying more for drugs, and therefore fund[ing] more R&D' sensible, in that light? Maybe I'm just bitter that he tried to charge a learning student $2k for Visual Studio back when I wanted to learn :)
I hope quelling malaria and other initiatives goes well though.
