This part I couldn't agree more with:
Fluff posts from John Gruber, who rarely says anything at all of value (and I say this as someone who spends most of my time working on iOS projects) are extraordinarily popular because it fits within the community’s ideology
John Gruber could literally publish a blog post with no content and just a title and it would hit the front-page of Hacker News and people would be commenting about how they get his metaphor and try connecting it to a new Apple gadget or sales report... Very overrated.
You missed one other point: the constant homepage submissions about Google Go. I've used it a couple of times myself and I think it's a great language, but the amount of posts about it you see on this site hitting the homepage are ridiculous. How much praise can you sing for something without repeating yourself? The same thing seems to be happening with Google's AngularJS.
I recently saw a submission for a Sublime Text editor clone someone wrote and open sourced. The author had disabled the ability to post an issue on the Github repo and people took the author to school and back in the comments section about it. The author clearly stated if you want to contribute, send me a pull request because I don't have time to fix issues. This guy open sourced some amazing code (written in Go of all languages) and instead of saying thank you, a few decided to laud the author with negativity.
Hacker News has flaws, I think over time they will work themselves out and the community will tame itself down (I hope), for the moment I'll hold on and enjoy the ride. I love nothing more than to take top commenters oozing negativity to town. Being able to tag and filter submissions would be amazing, I would immediately remove all Go and AngularJS posts if I could. Maybe someone should create a Chrome extension that does it? Take it one step further and add in some basic sentiment analysis to hide any negative comments on submissions.
So a Chrome extension to filter again (eg tag comment as "technical", "ideology" and see what others do) could be v interesting.
Unfortunately the most thoughtful, most civil comment threads, seem to disappear the fastest off the home page - and attract the fewest participants. This could be a community issue or a chicken and egg situation...
Definitely agree about the disappearing gems in the comments section. Being able to follow users would be cool as well, their comments would be moved and highlighted with a particular follow colour.
I am liking the sound of this.
Clearly some do, if these stories get upvoted. I think a better answer than downvoting would be a ways to organize and filter content besides the single-channel model which currently seems to assume either a homogenous community or content or both. Clearly useless and repetitive content should be flagged, but judging by the number of "this doesn't belong on HN / yes it does " comments i've seen, a lot of people have differing ideas of what Hacker News "should" be showing them.
> Votes on comments are used to express agreement or disagreement rather than value, perhaps because many people simply cannot see the difference between the two.
I believe upvotes and downvotes should only apply to threads themselves, and comments should be left alone. I'm sure i'm in the minority on this among HN users, but I think when you can downvote comments, then specious downvoting becomes inevitable because it's less work than coming up with a cogent or relevant comment.
However, I somehow lost the hope that bringing this topic would do any change. I even emailed pg, asking to delete my account including all my posts, but got no response ever. idk..
And "forking it" would be the (relatively) easy part. The hard part is getting people to show up and stick around.
> 1. Lack of a down-vote means vocal minorities are disproportionately represented. How many Hacker News users really want to see 5 stories about the TSA body scanners every time they log in? It doesn’t matter, because as long as 10% of them up-vote every story on the topic it’s going to flood the top page with them until they move on to something else.
FLAG. You only get limited flags, but FLAG THESE FUCKING SUBMISSIONS.
> Some people will say “they have flags” but flags are not down-votes, and even most people like myself who wish there were down-votes don’t use them as such. Flagging is for spam, trolling, etc. I may not like what you have to say, but I’ll fight for your right to not be flagged for saying it.
Flags act like down votes for submissions. In the absence of down votes flags are the only tool available for Submissions that do not belong here.
I'd agree that flags should not be used that way for comments.
> The community is full of ideologues to the point where the comments are most often just predictable talking points being regurgitated ad nauseum.
People need to downvote empty idealogagy. People need to down vote a lot more than they do. Perhaps it's a problem that only ten % of the site can downvote. I sometimes wonder what would happen if HN reversed the down / up vote privs - anyone can downvote, but you need 500 karma before you can upvote.
Anyway, sorry to see you go. Have fun, and good luck!
Thus, some people would go on a spree of horrific posting in order to earn an uberzot and "go out in style".
Gently counter productive.
Except 4 seems a tad too general, and going from snobbish to looking down on people is not always a one-to-one realtionship. I consider looking down on someone one of the worst evils and I am pretty sure I am not alone here (nor anywhere). At least I hope.
EDIT: ok, he just changed the password to something random.. :/ Dumb question, asking someone who left for how he left...oh man.. Sometimes I don't know where my mind is
@pg Please add a "disable account and delete my posts" button. Almost every site has that feature. It's disrespectful to assume somebody should not be ever able to leave. There is no way to disable your account, or delete all your posts. (I agree that submissions don't need to be deletable btw.)
